Alisa Childers Archives - Page 3 of 4

Tag Archive for: Alisa Childers

3 Razones por las que los cristianos deben ser investigadores de la evidencia en lugar de adictos a la experiencia

Por Alisa Childers

Dos hombres.

Ambos crecieron en hogares cristianos en los suburbios de Estados Unidos. Ambos tienen padres evangélicos famosos. Ambos tomaron decisiones personales porCristo y se involucraron de forma activa y se volvieron reconocidos en el ministerio. Uno se alejó de su fe y se convirtió en un humanista secular. El otro se ha convertido en uno de los principales apologistas y defensores de la fe cristiana.

¿Quiénes son estos dos hombres? El primero es Bart Campolo, hijo del evangelista y escritor Tony Campolo, y el otro es Sean McDowell, hijo del evangelista y escritor Josh McDowell. ¿Por qué sus caminos, bastante similares, los llevaron a destinos tan radicalmente diferentes?

Recientemente, los dos se reunieron para tener una discusión en Premier Christian Radio titulada “Por qué Bart perdió su fe, por qué Sean mantuvo la suya”. Fue una discusión fascinante, y lo que más me llamó la atención fue la razón que cada uno dio para haberse convertido en cristiano en primer lugar. Campolo describió cómo se convirtió al cristianismo tras encontrar un grupo de jóvenes con el que conectó y asistir a uno de sus retiros:

Hay cientos de niños allí. Es sábado por la noche, hay velas y fogatas y todos cantan “Nuestro Dios es un Dios impresionante” y “Te amamos Señor”. Y en medio de ese tipo de ambiente tuve lo que supongo que se llamaría un momento trascendente… sentí algo. Sentí que había algo que sucedía en esa sala que era más grande que el grupo. Sentí que me conectaba con algo. Y en ese momento… era Dios.

Escuché algo. Fue real para mí. La gente que no cree en las experiencias trascendentes siempre piensa: “No has ido al concierto adecuado… No has consumido las drogas adecuadas. No te has enamorado de la pareja adecuada”.

Estas experiencias son reales, y creo que cualquiera que sea la narrativa en la que te encuentres cuando tienes una, confirma esa narrativa. Si hubiera tenido ese mismo momento trascendental con mis amigos en una mezquita en Afganistán, me habría confirmado el Islam. Pero yo estaba en el mundo cristiano, así que, a partir de ese momento, Jesús era real para mí.

En palabras del propio Campolo, se hizo cristiano por una experiencia trascendente… un sentimiento que resonó profundamente en su corazón.

Más adelante en la conversación, McDowell dio su razón para convertirse en cristiano. Habiendo creído en el cristianismo desde que tiene memoria, experimentó algunas dudas serias sobre su fe cuando era un estudiante universitario. Cuando compartió sus dudas con su padre, éste le animó a no creer en algo simplemente porque es lo que le han dicho. Le instó a investigar por sí mismo las pruebas de la veracidad del cristianismo y a rechazar todo lo que no fuera cierto.

Tras realizar una importante investigación de evidencias, McDowell llegó a la conclusión de que el cristianismo es verdadero… y ésta es la razón por la que él es cristiano. Su fe no se construyó sobre un “momento trascendente”, sino sobre una dolorosa búsqueda de la realidad objetiva.

El cristianismo de Campolo fue confirmado por la experiencia, mientras que el de McDowell fue confirmado por la evidencia. Aquí hay 3 razones por las que los cristianos deben ser investigadores de la evidencia, en lugar de adictos a la experiencia:

1. Se le puede convencer de abandonar una experiencia.

Al igual que Campolo, el actor Brad Pitt fue criado en un hogar cristiano por ministros cristianos evangélicos. En una entrevista con la revista GQ, recordaba haber experimentado en los conciertos de rock algunas de las mismas sensaciones que sentía en los cultos cristianos:

Recuerdo haber ido a algunos conciertos, a pesar de que nos decían que los espectáculos de rock eran el diablo, básicamente. Nuestros padres nos dejaban ir, no eran neo al respecto. Pero me di cuenta de que el ensueño y la alegría y la exuberancia, incluso la agresividad, que sentía en el espectáculo de rock era lo mismo en el avivamiento. Uno es Jimmy Swaggart y otro es Jerry Lee Lewis, ¿sabes? Uno es Dios y el otro es el Diablo. Pero es lo mismo. Se sentía como si estuviéramos siendo manipulados. Lo que estaba claro para mí era: “No sabes de lo que estás hablando…”

Pitt se preguntó si todo era una farsa manipuladora, lo que le llevó a plantearse algunas preguntas serias a una edad muy temprana.

Si la fe de una persona se basa en un sentimiento o experiencia, puede ser fácil reinterpretar esa experiencia o explicarla, especialmente cuando se enfrenta a los argumentos de un escéptico inteligente, o a la aplastante realidad del sufrimiento y el mal.

2. Tu corazón y tus sentimientos mienten.

El profeta Jeremías describió el corazón humano como “engañoso sobre todas las cosas y desesperadamente enfermo”. Proverbios 3:5-7 nos dice que no “nos apoyemos en nuestro propio entendimiento”. Jesús describió el corazón humano como lleno de pensamientos como el asesinato, el adulterio, la inmoralidad sexual, el robo, el falso testimonio y la calumnia. Proverbios 28:26 nos dice que quien confía en su propia mente es un necio.

En otras palabras, no sigas, bajo ninguna circunstancia, a tu corazón.

Esto, por supuesto, contrasta con los temas que encontramos constantemente en el entretenimiento y en las redes sociales. Sin embargo, cuando se trata de creencias espirituales, confiar en nuestros corazones y seguir nuestros sentimientos puede conducir a todo tipo de teología aberrante, elecciones pecaminosas y una distorsión de la verdadera fe cristiana.

3. Puedes recurrir a la evidencia en momentos de duda o sufrimiento.

Uno de los mayores apologistas y evangelistas de los últimos tiempos es un hombre llamado Nabeel Qureshi. Qureshi creció en un hogar musulmán, y después de años de probar las afirmaciones del cristianismo y las del islam, dejó el islam y se hizo cristiano. Pagó un alto precio por su obediencia a Cristo, dejando a su devota familia musulmana con el corazón roto y las relaciones tensas.

En la cúspide de un ministerio respetado, creciente y fructífero, Qureshi recibió la noticia de que tenía un cáncer de estómago en fase 4… a la edad de 33 años, y con un nuevo bebé a bordo. Creía que Dios le iba a sanar, que habría una intervención milagrosa y un testimonio asombroso que contar sobre el poder sanador de Dios. Poco más de un año después de recibir su diagnóstico… murió.

Qureshi documentó su trayectoria contra el cáncer en YouTube, y en uno de los primeros vídeos, expresó que estaba un poco perturbado por esta terrible noticia. Sin embargo, repasó su teología y las pruebas de su creencia en Cristo. En su lecho de muerte, con un aspecto desgastado y como una sombra de su antiguo ser, glorificó a Dios haciendo exactamente lo mismo. Expresó su asombro y decepción por no haber sido sanado, pero dio testimonio de la existencia de Dios y de la veracidad del cristianismo basándose en lo que sabía que era cierto.

Qureshi fue fiel hasta el final, a pesar de su sufrimiento y de las dudas que se deslizaron en su mente en sus últimos días. Esto se debió a que tenía una firme comprensión de la verdad a la que sometió sus sentimientos. Su fe no fue desmantelada por la duda, el sufrimiento o incluso el dolor insoportable.

A fin de cuentas, el cristianismo no siempre va a ser agradable. Pregúntale al apóstol Pablo, que fue secuestrado, golpeado, azotado, encarcelado, ridiculizado, naufragado y apedreado, antes de ser decapitado. El cristianismo no siempre se va a sentir que “funciona”.

Convertirse en un investigador de pruebas en lugar de un adicto a las experiencias llevó al ex ateo J. Warner Wallace a una conclusión inquebrantable:

No soy cristiano porque me “funciona”. Tenía una vida antes del cristianismo que parecía funcionar bien, y mi vida como cristiano no siempre ha sido fácil.

Soy cristiano porque es verdad. Soy cristiano porque quiero vivir de una manera que refleje la verdad. Soy cristiano porque mi alta estima por la verdad no me deja otra alternativa.

En momentos de profunda duda o gran sufrimiento, es maravilloso saber que el cristianismo es verdadero, ¡lo sintamos o no!

Recursos recomendados en Español:

Robándole a Dios (tapa blanda), (Guía de estudio para el profesor) y (Guía de estudio del estudiante) por el Dr. Frank Turek

Por qué no tengo suficiente fe para ser un ateo (serie de DVD completa), (Manual de trabajo del profesor) y (Manual del estudiante) del Dr. Frank Turek

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Alisa Childers es una cantante y compositora estadounidense, más conocida por formar parte del grupo femenino de música cristiana ZOEgirl. Ha tenido una lista de los diez mejores sencillos de la radio, cuatro lanzamientos de estudio y recibió el premio Dove durante su tiempo con ZOEgirl. Años más tarde, Alisa experimentó un profundo desafío a su fe de toda la vida cuando empezó a asistir a lo que más tarde se identificaría como una iglesia cristiana progresista. Este desafío empujó a Alisa hacia la Apologética Cristiana. Actualmente se puede leer, escuchar y ver el trabajo de Alisa en línea, así como adquirir su libro recientemente publicado sobre el cristianismo progresista, titulado Another Gospel.

Blog Original: https://cutt.ly/LYaqFTi

Traducido por Jennifer Chavez

Editado por Daniela Checa Delgado

December 17, 2021/by Guest

Biblical Judgment in a “Don’t Judge Me” World

Theology and Christian Apologetics

By Alisa Childers

“YOU SHOULDN’T JUDGE.”

Once upon a couple of years ago, there was a wildly popular book written by a self-professed Christian author. It was released by a Christian publishing house and marketed on Christian platforms and websites. It was a fairy tale come true. Crushing it at the top of The New York Times Best Seller list and winning the hearts and minds of millions of women, it was featured in countless small group Bible studies and conferences nationwide.

The only problem is that the core message of the book is the exact opposite of the biblical Gospel. So, I decided to write a little review of it and post it on my blog. I didn’t anticipate this “little review” going viral, nor did I predict the boatloads of hate mail that would sail into my inbox in the following weeks.

Some of the emails cannot be repeated in polite company. But the bulk of the pushback can be distilled down to three fateful words: “You. Shouldn’t. Judge.”

The message I received loud and clear was that it was wrong of me to criticize unbiblical ideas in a popular book. After all, Jesus would never be such a “McJudgypants.” With love redefined to mean the affirmation of a desire or an idea, it’s easy to see how “judging” has become the unforgivable sin in our culture.

But Christians live by a different standard than the world. When someone says, “You shouldn’t judge,” they are actually contradicting real love, the Bible, and plain common sense. So, the next time someone pulls out this particular conversation-stopper, remember these three things:

SAYING “DON’T JUDGE” IS NOT BIBLICAL.

It seems like everyone’s favorite Bible verse (at least when they’re trying to keep someone from telling them they’re wrong) is Matthew 7:1. The words, “Judge not, that you be not judged,” come from the lips of Jesus himself.

Mic drop. End of conversation—right?

Well, that only works if you scribble out the next six verses, along with some other things Jesus said, and a good portion of the New Testament. In fact, just after saying, “Judge not,” Jesus lets his audience know that when they judge, they should be very careful to make sure their judgment isn’t hypocritical. “First take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye,” Jesus instructs in verse five. In other words, don’t point out a sin in your sister’s life before you confront the bigger sin in your own.

But the whole point is to help your sister take the speck out of her eye, which requires you to judge that it’s there. So, Jesus isn’t saying that it’s always wrong to judge. In fact, verse six tells us to “not give dogs what is holy, and do not throw your pearls before pigs.” How can one identify “dogs” and “pigs” unless they first judge correctly?

JUDGE THE FRUIT

If there is still any confusion, just a few verses later, Jesus tells us to recognize wolves, or false teachers, by their fruit. Again, this requires us to judge whether or not these teachers are speaking truth or deception. Then, in John 7:24, Jesus couldn’t say it more plainly. He directs his listeners to “not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.”

Later, in Matthew 18:15–16, Jesus gives instructions about how to confront a fellow believer if they’ve sinned against you. (Don’t forget to take the log out of your own eye first!) The apostle Paul echoes this sentiment in Galatians 6:1, by telling Christians how to handle a brother who is caught in a sin. He writes, “You who are spiritual”—think log-less in the eye—“should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.”

In 1 Corinthians 5, Paul tells the believers in Corinth that it’s actually their job to judge other believers. He writes, “What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside.”

Telling someone they shouldn’t judge is not biblical. In fact, Scripture actually commands us to judge, but to do it carefully, rightly, humbly, and without hypocrisy.

SAYING “DON’T JUDGE” IS NOT LOGICAL.

Imagine you are home alone and your doorbell rings. You peek through the window and observe a very large man with a gun in his hand, wearing an orange jumpsuit. He’s sweating and looking around nervously. Be honest. Are you going to open the door for him? My guess is … probably not. But wait. Why are you being so judgmental? Maybe he’s not an escaped convict but simply enjoys wearing orange jumpsuits and carrying his weapon while out for a jog. Who are you to judge?

Obviously, this is an extreme example. No one would open the door for that guy. But this goes to show that literally everyone judges. We all make judgments about people every single day. It would be beyond illogical, and sometimes unsafe, to not judge.

Plus, to even tell someone they shouldn’t judge is to judge that they are judging, which is considered judgmental, which requires making a judgment about all the judging. You get the point. But that whole logical mess can be avoided by simply taking Jesus’ advice to “judge with right judgment.”

SAYING “DON’T JUDGE” IS NOT LOVING.

When I was younger, I was trapped in a toxic cycle brought on by an eating disorder. One of my good friends, an eternal people-pleaser, worked up every last bit of courage she could muster to confront me. To put it lightly, it didn’t go well. I not-so-politely invited her to stop “judging” me and back all the way off.

Nevertheless, she persisted. Her determination to make sure I was not only helped but held accountable literally changed my life. I ended up confessing my secret and getting counseling as my healing began. To this day my eyes mist with tears when I think about how much she loved me to do such a difficult thing.

According to the Bible, love is patient and kind. It’s not arrogant or rude. 1 Corinthians 13:6 goes on to tell us that “love does not rejoice at wrongdoing but rejoices with the truth.” My friend couldn’t rejoice at my wrongdoing. Had she simply ignored the “speck in my eye,” and chosen to not judge, my life could have gone down a very different path.

She judged me because she loved me. And it quite possibly saved my life. Judging with right judgment is not only biblical and logical, but it’s also the most loving thing you can do.

COURAGEOUS JUDGMENT

Culture will always have its slogans, mantras, and catch-phrases. But haven’t Christians always been countercultural? Sometimes Jesus calls us to judge each other. As difficult as it may seem, obeying his commands will keep you from being tossed about by the whims of a fickle culture. After all, that culture won’t be there for you when your life (or the lives of the people you love) falls apart from following its advice. Jesus will.

And that’s something you can rightly judge to be true.

Juzgar bíblicamente en un mundo de “No me Juzgues”

Español

By Alisa Childers

“YOU SHOULD NOT JUDGE”

A couple of years ago, there was a very popular book written by an author who declared himself a Christian. It was published by a Christian publisher and marketed on Christian platforms and websites. It was a fairy tale come true. It reached the top of the New York Times Best Seller list and won the hearts and minds of millions of women, and was presented at countless small group Bible studies and conferences across the country.

The only problem is that the central message of the book is exactly the opposite of the biblical gospel. So I decided to write a little review of the book and post it on my blog. I didn’t expect this “little review” to go viral, nor did I predict the amount of hate mail that would arrive in my inbox in the following weeks.

Some of the emails cannot be repeated in the company of polite people. But most of the reactions can be summed up in three fateful words: “You. Should. Not. Judge.”

The message I received loud and clear was that it was wrong of me to criticize unbiblical ideas in a popular book. After all, Jesus would never be a “McJudge.” With love redefined as the affirmation of a desire or an idea, it’s easy to see how “judging” has become the unforgivable sin in our culture.

But Christians live by a different standard than the world. When someone says, “You shouldn’t judge,” they are actually contradicting real love, the Bible, and plain common sense. So, the next time someone brings up this particular argument to cut off the conversation, remember these three things:

SAYING “DO NOT JUDGE” IS NOT BIBLICAL

It seems like everyone’s favorite Bible verse (at least when they’re trying to avoid being told they’re wrong) is Matthew 7:1. The words “Judge not, that you be not judged” come from the lips of Jesus himself.

The microphone drops. End of conversation, right?

Well, that only works if you cross out the next six verses, along with other things Jesus said, and a good portion of the New Testament. In fact, right after saying “do not judge,” Jesus lets his audience know that when they judge, they must be very careful to make sure their judgment is not hypocritical . “First take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye,” Jesus instructs in verse five. In other words, don’t point out a sin in your sister’s life before confronting a bigger sin in your own.

Rather, it is about helping your sister remove the speck from her eye, which requires you to judge that it is there. Therefore, Jesus is not saying that it is always wrong to judge. In fact, verse six tells us to “do not give what is holy to dogs, nor throw your pearls before swine.” How can one identify the “dogs” and the “swine” if one does not first judge correctly?

JUDGE THE FRUIT

If there is still any confusion, just a few verses later, Jesus tells us to recognize wolves, or false teachers, by their fruits. Again, this requires us to judge whether these teachers are speaking truth or deception. Then, in John 7:24, Jesus couldn’t say it more clearly. He directs his listeners to “Do not judge according to appearances, but judge righteous judgment.”

Later, in Matthew 18:15-16, Jesus gives instructions on how to confront a fellow believer if he or she has sinned against you. (The apostle Paul echoes this sentiment in Galatians 6:1, telling Christians how to deal with a brother who is caught in sin. He writes, “You who are spiritual”—thinking without a plank in your eye—“restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness.”)

In 1 Corinthians 5, Paul tells the Corinthian believers that their job is actually to judge other believers. He writes, “Why should I judge those outside? Do you not judge those inside? For God will judge those outside.”

Telling someone not to judge is not biblical. In fact, Scripture commands us to judge, but to do so carefully, correctly, humbly, and without hypocrisy.

SAYING “DO NOT JUDGE” IS NOT LOGICAL

Imagine you’re home alone and the doorbell rings. You look out the window and see a very large man with a gun in his hand, dressed in an orange uniform. He’s sweating and looking around nervously. Be honest. Are you going to open the door for him? My guess is… probably not. But wait. Why are you judging him? Maybe he’s not an escaped convict, but he just enjoys dressing up in an orange uniform and carrying his gun while he goes for a run. Who are you to judge?

Obviously, this is an extreme example. No one would open the door to that guy. But it just goes to show that literally everyone is judgmental. We all judge people every day. It would be more than illogical, and sometimes unsafe, not to judge.

Furthermore, even telling someone that they should not judge is judging that they are judging, which is considered judgment, which requires making a judgment about whatever is being judged. You get the point. But all that logical mess can be avoided by simply following Jesus’ advice to “judge with righteous judgment.”

SAYING “DON’T JUDGE” IS NOT LOVING

When I was younger, I was trapped in a toxic cycle brought on by an eating disorder. One of my good friends, a perpetual people-pleaser, worked up all the courage she could to confront me. To put it mildly, it didn’t go well for her. I invited her, not very politely, to stop “judging” me and get out of the way.

But he persisted. His determination to make sure I was not only being helped, but also held accountable, literally changed my life. I ended up confessing my secret and getting psychological help when my recovery began. To this day, it brings tears to my eyes when I think about how much he loved me to do something so difficult.

According to the Bible, love is patient and kind. It is not arrogant or rude. 1 Corinthians 13:6 goes on to tell us that “love does not rejoice in unrighteousness but rejoices with the truth.” My friend could not rejoice in my wrongdoing. If I had simply ignored the “speck in my eye” and chosen not to judge, my life might have taken a very different path.

He judged me because he loved me. And quite possibly he saved my life. Judging with fair judgment is not only biblical and logical, but it is also the most loving thing you can do.

BRAVE JUDGMENT

Culture will always have its slogans, mantras, and catchphrases. But haven’t we Christians always been countercultural? Sometimes Jesus calls us to judge others. As difficult as it may be, obeying his commands will keep you from being swayed by the whims of a fickle culture. After all, that culture won’t be there for you when your life (or the lives of your loved ones) falls apart because you followed its advice. Jesus will.

And that is something you can rightly judge as true.

Recommended resources in Spanish:

Stealing from God ( Paperback ), ( Teacher Study Guide ), and ( Student Study Guide ) by Dr. Frank Turek

Why I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist ( Complete DVD Series ), ( Teacher’s Workbook ), and ( Student’s Handbook ) by Dr. Frank Turek

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Alisa Childers is a wife, mother, author, blogger, speaker, and worship leader. She was a member of the award-winning MCC recording group ZOEgirl. She is a popular speaker at Christian apologetics and worldview conferences, including STR’s Reality Conference . Alisa has published in The Gospel Coalition, Crosswalk, The Stream, For Every Mom, Decision magazine , and The Christian Post. Her book, Another Gospel? A Lifelong Christian Seeks Truth in Response to Progressive Christianity , is now available. You can also connect with Alisa online at alisachilders.com.

Original Blog: https://cutt.ly/UTUiGGi

Translated by Jennifer Chavez

Edited by Elenita Romero

November 19, 2021/by Guest

3 estrategias apologéticas que podemos observar en el Libro de los Hechos

Español

Por Alisa Childers

“¿Entiendes lo que estás leyendo?”

A esta simple pregunta se le atribuye la introducción del cristianismo a Etiopía. (1) En el libro de los Hechos capítulo 8 encontramos a Felipe, quien es guiado por un ángel al desierto para encontrarse con un oficial de la corte de la reina de Etiopía. Felipe se da cuenta que este oficial está leyendo el rollo del libro de Isaías donde se hallan las profecías del Mesías. En ese momento, Felipe podría haberse acercado y declarado audazmente: “¡He sido enviado a ti en este día para que escuches las buenas nuevas de Jesús, el Mesías!” Pero no lo hizo. Se encontró con este hombre justo donde estaba leyendo y le hizo una buena pregunta, la cual llevó a la explicación del evangelio. Esta es la mejor forma de apologética.

En ocasiones a la apologética se le llama “pre-evangelismo”, porque ayuda a remover los obstáculos intelectuales en el camino de la fe. El mandato de hacer apologética la encontramos en 1 Pedro 3:15 que nos dice que siempre debemos “estar preparados para presentar defensa ante toda persona que nos pida razón de la esperanza que hay en nosotros”. La palabra “defensa” en griego es apología, que es de donde sacamos nuestra palabra “apologética”. En el libro de los Hechos, cuando los apóstoles evangelizaban, ellos hacían apologética.

Ellos estaban defendiendo su fe constantemente –frente a líderes religiosos, políticos, filósofos seculares y ciudadanos comunes. He aquí tres formas en que usaron la apologética para defender su fe:

1. Defendieron el evangelio, no a ellos mismos.

Los apóstoles estaban acostumbrados a los juicios, los concilios y las prisiones. En Hechos 4, Pedro y Juan fueron llevados ante el gran concilio de Jerusalén y fueron desafiados a defender su derecho a predicar la resurrección de Jesús. Pedro no llevaba ni una frase en su defensa cuando empezó a proclamar el evangelio. No gastó su energía tratando de limpiar su nombre, o de evitar el tiempo de prisión – predicó la resurrección de Jesús al mismo concilio que lo estaba cuestionando.

Este ejemplo también lo siguió el mártir Esteban en los capítulos 6 y 7. Esteban era un cristiano judío que fue llevado ante el concilio acusado de blasfemar contra Dios y contra Moisés. En su famoso discurso, se dirigió al concilio relatando la historia de los judíos, señalando que los verdaderos profetas de Dios siempre fueron rechazados. Y enfatizó que la presencia de Dios no está limitada a una determinada área geográfica o templo. En un sentido, Esteban respondió a las acusaciones de blasfemia. Pero hizo más, él abrió la puerta, teológicamente hablando, para la misión mundial de la Iglesia. Fue una brillante defensa del evangelio. El erudito del Nuevo testamento F. F. Bruce, comentó lo siguiente acerca de la famosa “defensa” de Esteban:

Obviamente no es un discurso de defensa en el sentido jurídico del término. [Y] de ninguna manera fue formulado para asegurar una absolución ante el Sanedrín. Es más bien una defensa del cristianismo puro como el modo de adoración designado por Dios. (2)

El gran predicador Charles Spurgeon dijo esto de Esteban:

Le vemos defendiendo la fe ante una sinagoga de sutiles y filosóficos negadores de la verdad. Esteban el diácono se convirtió en Esteban el predicador…pues recibió una promoción más excelsa: cuando se hubo convertido en Esteban, el sabio apologista (3)

Cuando nuestra fe es atacada, puede ser tentador ponerse a la defensiva. Pero seríamos sabios si siguiéramos el ejemplo de los apóstoles y defendiéramos el evangelio, no a nosotros mismos

2. Ellos compartieron evidencia de testigos oculares de la resurrección de Jesús, no sus testimonios personales.

Los testimonios personales de los apóstoles ciertamente se cruzaron con los relatos de los testigos oculares de la resurrección de Jesús, porque ellos fueron los testigos oculares. Pero su mensaje se centraba en Jesús, no en ellos mismos. En otras palabras, cuando ellos compartían el evangelio, no hablaban sobre lo que Jesús hizo por ellos personalmente y luego simplemente invitaban a otros a tener una relación personal con Él. Testificaban el hecho de que Jesús fue crucificado, sepultado y resucitado, ofreciendo la salvación a todos los que se arrepintieran y pusieran su fe en Jesús el Mesías. Este tema es consistente en todo el libro de los Hechos.

El testimonio personal puede ser una gran manera de construir una relación, pero nuestros testimonios siempre deben apuntar a algo más grande: las buenas noticias de la muerte y resurrección de Jesús.

3. Ellos conocían las Escrituras pero en ocasiones no lo utilizaban inmediatamente.

Los primeros cristianos eran judíos que estaban saturados de las Escrituras del Antiguo Testamento. Cuando Pablo se convirtió en el capítulo 9 inmediatamente comenzó a predicar a los judíos en Damasco, “demostrando que Jesús era el Cristo”. En el capítulo 13 habló en la sinagoga de Antioquía, remitiéndose a las Escrituras del Antiguo Testamento para mostrar a los judíos que Jesús era el Mesías esperado. En el capítulo 17 fue a la sinagoga de Tesalónica y ahí “razonó con ellos a partir de las Escrituras”.

Más adelante en este mismo capítulo, Pablo estaba en Atenas conversando con los filósofos epicúreos y estoicos. Estos filósofos no habrían aceptado el Antiguo Testamento judío como autoritativo, así que Pablo usó una táctica diferente para llegar al evangelio. En lugar de apelar a las Escrituras, él mencionó a su propio altar religioso con la inscripción, “Al dios no conocido”. Luego procedió a presentarles al Dios que aún no conocían, incluso citando a sus propios y respetados pensadores filosóficos. Él utilizó esto como táctica para la resurrección de Jesús.

Esto no significa que las Escrituras no sean importantes o ignoradas. Solo significa que a veces tenemos que encontrarnos con la gente donde están y empezar desde ahí.

Conclusión:

Los apóstoles utilizaron la apologética de manera creativa, adaptando su método a la situación en la que se encontraban. El tema en común entre estos tres métodos es que el evangelio siempre fue el punto principal. Los apóstoles mantuvieron el enfoque de su evangelización en la resurrección de Jesús y la esperanza de la fe salvadora en Él –¡Y nosotros también deberíamos hacerlo!

Recursos recomendados en Español:

Robándole a Dios (tapa blanda), (Guía de estudio para el profesor) y (Guía de estudio del estudiante) por el Dr. Frank Turek

Por qué no tengo suficiente fe para ser un ateo (serie de DVD completa), (Manual de trabajo del profesor) y (Manual del estudiante) del Dr. Frank Turek

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Alisa Childers es cantante y compositora estadounidense, más conocida por formar parte del grupo femenino de música cristiana ZOEgirl. Ha tenido una serie de sencillos en el top 10 de la radio, cuatro álbumes de estudio, y recibió el premio Dove durante su tiempo con ZOEgirl. Años más tarde, Alisa encontró su fe de toda la vida profundamente desafiada cuando comenzó a asistir a lo que más tarde se identificaría como una Iglesia Cristiana Progresiva. Este reto empujó a Alisa hacia la apologética cristiana. Hoy en día podemos leer, escuchar y ver el trabajo de Alisa en internet, y también adquirir su libro recientemente publicado sobre el cristianismo progresivo titulado Another Gospel.

Blog Original: https://cutt.ly/yEo2Jkx

Traducido por Gustavo Camarillo

Editado por Elenita Romero

September 18, 2021/by Guest

3 Apologetics Strategies from the Book of Acts

Theology and Christian Apologetics

By Alisa Childers

”Do you understand what you’re reading?“

This simple question is credited with carrying Christianity into Ethiopia. (1) Acts chapter 8 tells of Philip being led to the desert by an angel to meet an officer from the court of the Queen of Ethiopia. Philip finds him reading an Isaiah scroll containing prophecies about the Messiah. At this point, Philip could have walked up and boldly declared, “I have been sent to you today to proclaim the good news of Jesus the Messiah!” But he didn’t. He met this man right where he was at and asked a good question, which then led to an explanation of the gospel. This is apologetics at its best.

Apologetics is sometimes called “pre-evangelism” because it can help clear intellectual obstacles in the way of faith. The command to do apologetics is found in 1 Peter 3:15 which tells us to always be “prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you.” The Greek word translated as “defense” is apologia, which is where we get our English word, “apologetics.” In the book of Acts, when the apostles did evangelism, they did apologetics.

They were constantly defending their faith—to religious leaders, political officers, secular philosophers, and average citizens. Here are 3 ways they used apologetics to defend their faith:

1. They defended the gospel, not themselves.

The apostles were no strangers to trials, councils, and prisons. In Acts 4, Peter and John were brought before the Jerusalem high council and were challenged to defend their right to preach the resurrection of Jesus. Peter wasn’t even one sentence into his defense when he began to proclaim the gospel. He didn’t spend his energy trying to clear his name, or avoid prison time—he preached the resurrection of Jesus to the very council that was questioning him.

This example was also followed by the martyr Stephen in chapters 6-7. Stephen was a Jewish Christian who was brought before the council and accused of blasphemy against Moses and God. In his famous speech, he addressed the council by recounting the history of the Jews, pointing out that God’s true prophets have always been rejected. He also stressed that God’s presence isn’t confined to one specific geographical area or temple. On one level, Stephen answered the charges of blasphemy. But even more, he opened the door theologically for the church’s worldwide mission. It was a brilliant defense of the gospel. New Testament scholar F.F. Bruce commented on Stephen’s famous “defense”:

It is obviously not a speech for the defense in the forensic sense of the term. [It is] by no means calculated to secure an acquittal before the Sanhedrin. It is rather a defense of pure Christianity as God’s appointed way of worship. (2)

The great preacher Charles Spurgeon said this of Stephen:

We see him defending the faith against a synagogue of subtle philosophical deniers of the truth. Stephen the deacon became Stephen the preacher….he had a higher promotion yet—when he had thus become Stephen the wise apologist. (3)

When our faith is under fire, it can be tempting to become defensive. But we would be wise to follow the example of the apostles and defend the gospel, not ourselves.

2. They shared eyewitness evidence of Jesus’ resurrection, not their personal testimonies.

The personal testimonies of the apostles certainly intersected the eyewitness accounts of Jesus’ resurrection because they were the eyewitnesses. But their message was focused on Jesus, not themselves. In other words, when they shared the gospel, they didn’t talk about what Jesus did for them personally and then simply invite others to have a personal relationship with Him. They testified to the fact that He was crucified, buried, and resurrected, offering salvation to all who would repent and put their faith in Jesus the Messiah. This theme is consistent throughout the book of Acts.

Personal testimony can be a great way to build a relationship, but our testimonies should always point to something greater—the good news of the death and resurrection of Jesus.

3. They knew Scripture but sometimes didn’t use it right away.

The first Christians were Jews who were steeped in the Old Testament Scriptures. When Paul was converted in chapter 9, he immediately began preaching to the Jews in Damascus, “proving that Jesus was the Christ.” In chapter 13, he spoke in the synagogue in Antioch, referring to the Old Testament Scriptures to show the Jews that Jesus was the expected Messiah. In chapter 17, he went into the synagogue in Thessalonica and “reasoned with them from the Scriptures.”

Later in the same chapter, Paul was in Athens conversing with Epicurean and Stoic philosophers. These philosophers wouldn’t have accepted the Jewish Old Testament as authoritative, so Paul used a different tactic to get to the gospel. Rather than appeal to the Scriptures, he mentioned their own religious altar with the inscription, “To the unknown god.” He then proceeded to introduce them to the God they didn’t yet know, even quoting their own respected philosophical thinkers. He used this as a tactic to testify to the resurrection of Jesus.

This does not mean that the Scriptures were unimportant or ignored. It just means that sometimes we need to meet people where they are at and start from there.

Conclusion:

The apostles used apologetics creatively, adapting their method to the situation they were in. The common theme among these three methods is that the gospel was always the main point. The apostles kept the focus of their evangelism on the resurrection of Jesus and the hope of saving faith in Him—and we should too!

Las 5 personas más ilógicas que conocerás en Internet

Español

By Alisa Childers

It’s happened to many of us. We post an encouraging Bible verse like Psalm 145:9 on Facebook: ” The Lord is good to all, and his compassion is over all his works .” At noon an atheist somewhere on social media finds the post and leaves a lovely comment:

Seriously? Your god is good? He’s so good and compassionate that he decided to literally drown the entire world in a flood? So good that he’s okay with slavery? That god? Yeah, that sounds amazing.

The person leaving comments like these probably isn’t looking for a real conversation, but they are a great example of the abundance of bad logic waiting to be discovered in the dark corners of cyberspace. Here are the 5 most illogical people you’ll find on the Internet, and how to spot their fallacies:

1. The Straw Man

How easy do you think it would be to take down a fake man made entirely of straw? It would be a lot easier than taking down a real man, that’s for sure. This happens in the world of social media disagreements – All-The-Time. The “Straw Man” is a fallacy where someone simplifies or misrepresents their opponent’s view (builds a straw man), and then argues against that false view (takes down the straw man). Straw men can often be found in discussions about abortion:

You : “I think there is good scientific evidence that life begins at conception.”
Straw Man : “You mean women should lose their rights and this country should be sent back to the 1950s? That’s ridiculous.”

You made a claim about scientific evidence, not about women’s rights. The strawman has twisted your argument and created one that is much easier to refute.

2. The Red Herring or the Red Lure

The “Red Decoy” fallacy is committed when someone brings up an irrelevant point that diverts attention from the original point that was made. Changing the subject doesn’t actually win an argument, but it can make people forget what they were disagreeing about in the first place.

You : “I believe the Bible teaches that Jesus claimed to be God.”
The Red Decoy : “The Bible is just a book written by humans; it is no different from any other book.”

Red bait has shifted attention from what the Bible teaches to the credibility of the Bible as a book. It is a worthy discussion, but it is a different discussion, don’t take the bait.

3. The Slanderer

This fallacy is called “Ad-Hominem,” and it attacks the character of the person making the claim, rather than addressing the person’s actual argument.

You : “I think it’s best for children for marriage to be between a man and a woman.”
The Slanderer : “You only believe this because you’re a fanatic.”

The slanderer has shifted the focus from your claim to his perception of the motive behind it, thereby avoiding the real argument. The strawman, the red herring, and the slanderer can be handled in a similar way, gently bringing them back to their original point.

4. The Self-Destructor

A self-defeator is a person who makes a statement that refutes themselves. You can spot a self-defeating statement by taking the statement being made and applying it to the statement itself.

You : “I believe Christianity is true.”
The Self-Destructor : “the truth does not exist.”

If you can spot this self-defeating statement, a simple question will bring the fallacy to the surface: “Is that true?”

5. The Gish or Machine Gun Gallop

The “Gish Gallop” (or machine gun fallacy) is a fallacy where someone introduces so many (often individually weak) arguments into a space that it is never possible to respond to them all. This happens most often in live debates, but there are “machine gun fallacies” on the internet too!

You : “I believe that Jesus rose from the dead.”
The Fallacy Machine Gun: We can’t trust anything the Bible says because the Gospels were written hundreds of years after the apostles were alive, and they all tell different stories. In fact, the Old Testament stories of the Flood and Creation were simply copies of myths from the surrounding culture, and frankly, the resurrection can’t happen because science has proven that miracles aren’t possible. The story of Jesus is nothing more than a compilation of other myths about gods dying and rising in Mediterranean agrarian societies. Paul wasn’t really an apostle so we can’t trust what he said, and Jesus probably never existed anyway.

Note that the fallacy gunner has introduced several possibly related but unsubstantiated claims that no person with a real life or job would be able to sit down and answer in one sitting—it would take all day! There are several ways to deal with a fallacy gunner, but the simplest would be to stay within the scope of your original claim. You didn’t make any claims about the Bible, the Flood and Creation accounts, or Paul’s status as an apostle. You made a claim about a miracle, so that’s a good place to start.

Conclusion :

It’s easy for any of us to fall into some of these traps, so look out for these 5 illogical people while interacting on social media, and be careful not to be one yourself!

Recommended resources in Spanish:

Stealing from God ( Paperback ), ( Teacher Study Guide ), and ( Student Study Guide ) by Dr. Frank Turek

Why I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist ( Complete DVD Series ), ( Teacher’s Workbook ), and ( Student’s Handbook ) by Dr. Frank Turek

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Alisa Childers is an American singer and songwriter, best known for being part of the all-female Christian music group ZOEgirl. She has had one top ten radio single, four studio releases, and received a Dove Award during her time with ZOEgirl. Years later, Alisa experienced a profound challenge to her lifelong faith when she began attending what would later be identified as a progressive Christian church. This challenge pushed Alisa towards Christian Apologetics. You can currently read, listen to, and watch Alisa’s work online, as well as purchase her recently released book on progressive Christianity, titled Another Gospel.

Original source of the blog: https://cutt.ly/3nSwf67

Translated by Elias Castro

Edited by Cynthia Araya

June 18, 2021/by Guest

Book Review: Another Gospel? by Alisa Childers

Theology and Christian Apologetics

By Timothy Fox

In my last blog post, I shared some of the most important books regarding cultural issues that I read in the year since the COVID lockdowns began in March 2020. While those books dealt with the culture at large, my next two reads focused on cultural and theological issues impacting the church: Confronting Injustice without Compromising Truth by Thaddeus Williams, and the book I am reviewing here Another Gospel?: A Lifelong Christian Seeks Truth in Response to Progressive Christianity by Alisa Childers.

Content

Another Gospel? follows the story of former ZOEgirl, Alisa Childers, as her orthodox Christian faith was challenged in a study group led by a progressive Christian pastor. In the first two chapters, Alisa sets the stage of her spiritual journey and traces the history of progressive Christianity from its roots in the emerging church to its current form. While progressive Christianity has no set dogma, its hallmarks are the rejection, or at least questioning, of core classical Christian doctrines, such as the deity of Christ, Jesus’s physical resurrection, and the divine nature of the Bible. This key aspect of progressive Christianity, the process of rejecting or questioning Christian doctrines, is known as deconstruction, “where all beliefs someone was raised with and had never questioned are systematically pulled apart” (7). Another Gospel? subsequently explores the deconstruction and reconstruction of Alisa’s faith.

Chapters three through eleven each tackle a main question or issue raised against classical Christianity. Most topics are intellectual, such as the authority of the Bible, while others are emotional, such as spiritual abuse and disdain for traditional biblical morality. Alisa shows how progressive Christianity has imbibed the spirit of the age in that it offers a more “tolerant” and “inclusive” Christianity. Yet, it does so by ignoring or outright rejecting much that the Bible and historical Christianity has taught for centuries.

The book closes with Alisa’s reconstruction. By seeking answers to the questions that the progressive pastor raised, Alisa’s faith in Christianity became stronger than before. This is also Alisa’s hope for those reading her book, that they will have confidence that Christianity—classical, traditional, orthodox Christianity—is really true.

Audience

The target reader of Another Gospel? is obviously someone who is in the same position in which Alisa found herself, a person wrestling with the questions and challenges of progressive Christianity. Alisa shows us the types of objections that are raised and how Christianity can fully answer them all. It’s important to note, however, that none of the topics discussed are specific to progressive Christianity. The objections to which Alisa responds are also commonly raised by skeptics and atheists, such as the reliability of the New Testament or the fairness of Hell. This shows us that there really are no new objections to Christianity (that haven’t already been answered) and that progressive Christianity itself isn’t new. It’s just skepticism and postmodernism posing as Christianity. So even if someone is not interested specifically in progressive Christianity, one will still find Another Gospel? to be a great, accessible apologetics resource.

But what about someone who is already well-studied in apologetics and theology? While many of the objections to which Alisa responds are standard apologetics fare, they are framed within the context of progressive Christianity. Alisa explores the tactics and methods by which progressive Christians cause others to doubt their childhood faith. Another Gospel? shows us the progressive Christian mindset, as well as the types of arguments for which a Christian should prepare when engaging progressive Christians. So, even Christians who are familiar with the objections raised in the book can still benefit from reading it.

Other Thoughts

Most importantly, Another Gospel? highlights just how dangerous progressive Christianity can be. As I mentioned above, many of the objections to which Alisa responds are the same objections of the typical skeptic. When challenged by a skeptic, though, a Christian may naturally know to keep up one’s guard, as the skeptic will be viewed as an opponent. But a progressive Christian may be viewed as a trusted friend, a brother or sister in Christ, and so the challenges raised will seem legitimate and not detrimental to one’s faith. This is the true danger of progressive Christianity. Another Gospel? is yet another reminder that challenges to Christianity do not always rise from outside, but also from within through wolves in sheep’s clothing (Matt. 7:15).

Conclusion

Alisa Childers has provided Christians an important resource for a growing challenge against the Church. She exposes progressive Christianity for what it is—a dangerous combination of skepticism and postmodernism that can easily destroy the faith of an uninformed Christian. Another Gospel? is a great safeguard against the objections raised by progressive Christians. Although Alisa grapples with difficult issues, she does so simply and clearly, making her book accessible to anyone, from apologetics veterans to laypersons. I highly recommend Another Gospel? by Alisa Childers to those concerned with the increasing influence of progressive Christianity within the Church, as well as to anyone who simply wishes for good answers to difficult questions.

3 Reasons Why Christians Should Be Evidential Investigators Instead of Experience Junkies

Theology and Christian Apologetics

By Alisa Childers

Two men.

Both grew up in Christian homes in suburban America. Both have famous Evangelical fathers. Both made personal decisions for Christ and became actively involved and well-known in ministry. One walked away from his faith and became a secular humanist. The other has become one of the top apologists and defenders of the Christian faith.

Who are these two men? The first is Bart Campolo, son of evangelist and author Tony Campolo, and the other is Sean McDowell, son of evangelist and author Josh McDowell. Why did their fairly similar paths lead them to such radically different destinations?

Recently, the two came together to have a discussion on Premier Christian Radio entitled, “Why Bart Lost His Faith, Why Sean Kept His.” It was a fascinating discussion, and the thing that most struck me was the reason they each gave for having become a Christian in the first place. Campolo described how he converted to Christianity after finding a youth group he connected with and attending one of their retreats:

There’s hundreds of kids there. It’s Saturday night, there’s candlelight and firelight and everybody’s singing “Our God is an Awesome God,” and “We Love You Lord.” And in the midst of that kind of environment I had what I guess you would call a transcendent moment…I felt something. It felt like there was something happening in that room that was bigger than the group. I felt like I was connecting to something. And in that moment ….that was God.

I heard something. It was real to me. People that don’t believe in transcendent experiences—I always think like, “You haven’t been to the right concert… You haven’t used the right drugs. You haven’t fallen in love with the right partner.”

These experiences are real, and I think whatever narrative you’re in when you have one, it confirms that narrative. If I would have had that same transcendent moment with my friends in a mosque in Afghanistan, it would have confirmed Islam to me. But I was in the Christian world, so from that point on, Jesus was real to me.

In Campolo’s own words, he became a Christian because of a transcendent experience….a feeling that resonated deeply in his heart.

Later in the conversation, McDowell gave his reason for becoming a Christian. Having believed in Christianity as far back as he can remember, he experienced some serious doubts about his faith when he was a college student. When he shared his doubts with his father, his dad encouraged him to not believe something simply because it’s what he was told. He urged him to investigate the evidence for the truthfulness of Christianity for himself, and to reject anything that was untrue.

After doing some significant evidence investigation, McDowell arrived at the conclusion that Christianity is true….and this is the reason he is a Christian. His faith was not built upon a “transcendent moment,” but on a painful search for objective reality.
Campolo’s Christianity was confirmed by experience, while McDowell’s was confirmed by evidence. Here are 3 reasons why Christians should be evidential investigators, instead of experience junkies:

1. You can be talked out of an experience.

Like Campolo, actor Brad Pitt was raised in a Christian home by Evangelical Christian ministers. In an interview with GQ magazine, he remembered experiencing some of the same feelings at rock concerts that he felt in Christian worship services:

I remember going to a few concerts, even though we were told rock shows are the Devil, basically. Our parents let us go, they weren’t neo about it. But I realized that the reverie and the joy and exuberance, even the aggression, I was feeling at the rock show was the same thing at the revival. One is Jimmy Swaggart and one is Jerry Lee Lewis, you know? One’s God and one’s Devil. But it’s the same thing. It felt like we were being manipulated. What was clear to me was “You don’t know what you’re talking about—”

Pitt wondered if the whole thing was a manipulative sham, which led him to ask some serious questions at a very young age.

If a feeling or experience is what a person’s faith is built upon, it can be easy to re-interpret that experience or explain it away—especially when confronted with the arguments of a smart skeptic, or the crushing reality of suffering and evil.

2. Your heart and feelings lie.

The prophet Jeremiah described the human heart as “deceitful above all things and desperately sick.” Proverbs 3:5-7 tells us not to “lean on our own understanding.” Jesus described the human heart as being filled with thoughts like murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, and slander. Proverbs 28:26 tells us that whoever trusts his own mind is a fool.

In other words, do not, under any circumstances, follow your heart.

This, of course, stands in stark contrast to the themes we are constantly encountering in entertainment and on social media. However, when it comes to spiritual beliefs, trusting our hearts and following our feelings can lead to all sorts of aberrant theology, sinful choices, and a distortion of true Christian faith.

3. You can fall back on evidence in times of doubt or suffering.

One of the greatest apologists and evangelists in recent times is a man named Nabeel Qureshi. Qureshi grew up in a Muslim home, and after years of testing the claims of Christianity and the claims of Islam, he left Islam and became a Christian. He paid a dear price for his obedience to Christ, leaving his devout Muslim family heartbroken and relationships strained.

At the peak of a respected, growing, and fruitful ministry, Qureshi received news that he had stage 4 stomach cancer….at the age of 33, and with a new baby in tow. He believed God was going to heal him—that there would be miraculous intervention and an amazing testimony to tell about the healing power of God. A little over a year after receiving his diagnosis……he died.

Qureshi documented his cancer journey on youtube, and in one of the early videos, he expressed being a bit rattled by this grim news. However, he went back through his theology and the evidence for his belief in Christ. On his deathbed, looking worn and like a shadow of his former self, he glorified God by doing the exact same thing. He expressed his wonder and disappointment that he hadn’t been healed, but he testified to the existence of God and the truthfulness of Christianity based on what he knew was true.

Qureshi was faithful to the end—despite his suffering and despite any doubts that crept into his mind in his last days. This was because he had a firm understanding of truth to which he submitted his feelings. His faith was not dismantled by doubt, suffering, or even excruciating pain.

At the end of the day, Christianity isn’t always going to feel good. Just ask the apostle Paul who was kidnapped, beaten, whipped, imprisoned, ridiculed, shipwrecked, and stoned—all before he was finally beheaded. Christianity isn’t always going to feel like it’s “working.”

Becoming an evidential investigator rather than an experience junkie led former atheist J. Warner Wallace to an unshakeable conclusion:

I’m not a Christian because it “works” for me. I had a life prior to Christianity that seemed to be working just fine, and my life as a Christian hasn’t always been easy.

I’m a Christian because it is true. I’m a Christian because I want to live in a way that reflects the truth. I’m a Christian because my high regard for the truth leaves me no alternative.

In times of deep doubt or great suffering, it’s wonderful to know that Christianity is true— whether we feel it or not!

Did Jesus Really Rise From the Dead? A Historian, an Atheist, a Skeptic, a Theologian, and an Ex-Con Weigh In

CrossExamined

By Alisa Childers

It’s that time of year again—the time when Christians come together to celebrate the pinnacle of our faith, the resurrection of Jesus. It’s also the time when news outlets like Time, the Discovery Channel, and Newsweek unleash their skepticism about Christianity, the Bible, and the resurrection. It can be confusing to wade through the various historical evidences, personal beliefs, and opinions floating around in scholarship and the blogosphere. Here are quotes from several sources who all have unique qualifications and an interesting take on the evidence:

1. The Historian

Gary Habermas is an American historian, and the Distinguished Research Professor of Apologetics and Philosophy at Liberty University. He is considered to be one of the foremost scholars on the resurrection of Jesus. While researching the resurrection, he combed through the works of both secular and Christian scholars. He wrote:

I recently completed an overview of more than 1,400 sources on the resurrection of Jesus published since 1975. I studied and catalogued about 650 of these texts in English, German, and French. Some of the results of this study are certainly intriguing. For example, perhaps no fact is more widely recognized than that early Christian believers had real experiences that they thought were appearances of the risen Jesus. A critic may claim that what they saw were hallucinations or visions, but he does not deny that they actually experienced something.[1]

There is a virtual consensus among scholars who study Jesus’ resurrection that, subsequent to Jesus’ death by crucifixion, his disciples really believed that he appeared to them risen from the dead.[2]

2. The Atheist

Gerd Ludemann is a German New Testament scholar, historian, and atheist. He was once a professing Christian, but walked away from his faith when he became convinced that very little of what is contained in the New Testament is historically reliable. Even so, he wrote:

It may be taken as historically certain that Peter and the disciples had experiences after Jesus’s death in which Jesus appeared to them as the risen Christ.[3]

3. The Skeptic

Bart Ehrman is the Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is one of the most respected scholars in the field of New Testament studies—and he is agnostic. About the resurrection of Jesus, he wrote:

Historians, of course, have no difficulty speaking about the belief in the resurrection of Jesus, since this is a matter of public record. It is a historical fact that some of Jesus’ followers came to believe that he had been raised from the dead soon after his execution. We know some of these believers by name; one of them, the Apostle Paul, claims quite plainly to have seen Jesus alive after his death. Thus, for the historian, Christianity begins after the death of Jesus, not with the resurrection itself, but with the belief in the resurrection.[4]

In a recent blog post he wrote:

The most important thing to stress is that there are two historical realities that simply cannot be denied. The followers of Jesus did claim that Jesus came back to life. If they had not claimed that, we would not have Christianity. So they did claim it. Moreover, they did claim that they knew he rose precisely because some of them saw him alive again afterward. No one can doubt that.[5]

4. The Theologian

The type of historical evidence above caused leading New Testament scholar, historian, and theologian N.T. Wright to conclude:

As a historian, I cannot explain the rise of early Christianity unless Jesus rose again, leaving an empty tomb behind him.[6]

5. The Ex-con

Charles Colson, who once served as Special Counsel to President Richard Nixon, famously went to prison for his involvement in the Watergate scandal in the early 70’s. He became a Christian in 1973, largely due to the evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. One detail regarding Watergate was similar to the resurrection: in both cases, 12 men claimed something that would affect world history. In the case of Watergate, it only took two weeks for them to crack under pressure:

The real cover-up, the lie, could only be held together for two weeks, and then everybody else jumped ship in order to save themselves. Now, the fact is that all that those around the President were facing was embarrassment, maybe prison. Nobody’s life was at stake.

But what about the disciples? Twelve powerless men, peasants really, were facing not just embarrassment or political disgrace, but beatings, stonings, execution. Every single one of the disciples insisted, to their dying breaths, that they had physically seen Jesus bodily raised from the dead. Don’t you think that one of those apostles would have cracked before being beheaded or stoned? That one of them would have made a deal with the authorities? None did.

Jesus is Lord: That’s the thrilling message of Easter. And it’s an historic fact, one convincingly established by the evidence—and one you can bet your life upon. Go ahead researchers—dig up all the old graves you want. You won’t change a thing. He has risen.[7]

Even the atheists and skeptics confirm that Jesus’ disciples claimed and believed that they had seen Jesus risen from the dead. History tells us that they were willing to suffer and die for that belief. It’s reasonable to confidently agree with what the church has affirmed over the centuries—”Christ is risen. He is risen indeed!”[8]

References:

[1] Gary R. Habermas & Michael R. Licona, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2004) p. 60 (Emphasis mine)

[2] Ibid., p. 49

[3] Gerd Lüdemann, What Really Happened to Jesus?, trans. John Bowden (Louisville, Kent.: Westminster John Knox Press, 1995) p. 80

[4] Bart Ehrman, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings (Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, 2004) p. 234 (Emphasis mine)

[5] Bart Ehrman, “Questions on the Resurrection and My Personal Spiritual Experiences: Readers’ Mailbag” www.ehrmanblog.org, March 24, 2017, accessed April 6, 2017

[6] N.T. Wright, “The New Unimproved Jesus,” Christianity Today (September 13, 1993), p. 26 (Cited by William Lane Craig, “The Resurrection of Jesus” www.reasonablefaith.org, accessed April 6, 2017)

[7] Charles Colson, “An Unholy Hoax?” www.epm.org, March 29, 2002, accessed April 6, 2017.

[8] John 11:25-26

The 5 Most Illogical People You Will Meet on the Internet

Atheism, Theology and Christian Apologetics

By Alisa Childers

It has happened to many of us. We post an encouraging Bible verse like Psalm 145:9 on Facebook: “The Lord is good to all; he has compassion on all he has made.” By noon an atheist from somewhere in social media land has found the post and leaves a lovely comment:

Really? Your god is good? He’s so good and compassionate that he decided to literally drown the whole world in a flood? So good he’s okay with slavery? That god? Yeah—he sounds awesome.

The person who leaves comments like these probably isn’t looking for a real conversation, but they are a great example of the abundance of bad logic waiting to be discovered in the dark corners of cyberspace. Here are the 5 most illogical people you will meet on the internet, and how to spot their fallacies:

1. The Straw Man

How easy do you think it would be to knock down a pretend man made entirely of straw? It would be a lot easier than knocking down a real man—that’s for sure. This happens in the world of social media disagreement All. The. Time. The “Straw Man” is a fallacy in which someone oversimplifies or misrepresents the view of their opponent (builds a straw man), and then argues against that false view (knocks the straw man down). Straw men can often be found in discussions about abortion:

You: “I think there is good scientific evidence that life begins at conception.”
Straw man: “So what you’re saying is that women should lose their rights and this country should be sent back to the ‘50s? That’s ridiculous.”

You made a claim about scientific evidence—not women’s rights. The straw man has misrepresented your argument and created one that is much easier to refute.

2. The Red Herring

The “Red Herring” fallacy is committed when someone brings up an irrelevant point that diverts attention from the original point being made. Changing the subject doesn’t actually win an argument, but it can make people forget what they were disagreeing about in the first place.

You: “I believe the Bible teaches that Jesus claimed to be God.”
Red Herring: “The Bible is just a human book—no different from any other book.”

The red herring has diverted attention away from what the Bible teaches to the credibility of the Bible as a book. It’s a worthy discussion, but it’s a different discussion—don’t take the bait.

3. The Character Assassinator

This fallacy is called “Ad-Hominem,” and attacks the character of the person making the claim, rather than addressing the person’s actual argument.

You: “I believe it’s in the best interest of children for marriage to be between one man and one woman.”
Character Assassinator: “You only believe this because you’re a bigot.”

The character assassinator has shifted the focus from your claim to their perception of the motive behind it—thus avoiding the actual argument. The straw man, red herring, and character assassinator can all be handled in a similar way—by gently bringing them back to your original point.

4. The Self-Defeater

The self-defeater is a person who makes a statement that refutes itself. You can spot a self-defeating statement by taking the claim that is being made and applying that claim to the statement itself.

You: “I believe Christianity is true.”
Self-defeater: “There is no such thing as truth”

If you can spot this self-defeating statement, one simple question will bring the fallacy to the surface: “Is that true?”

5. The Gish Galloper

The “Gish Gallop” is a fallacy in which someone introduces so many (often individually weak) arguments in one space, that you could never possibly answer them all. This tends to happen more often in live-debate settings, but there are internet gish gallopers as well!

You: “I believe Jesus was resurrected from the dead.”
Gish galloper: “We can’t trust anything the Bible says because the Gospels were written hundreds of years after the apostles were alive, and they all tell different stories. In fact, the Old Testament flood and creation stories were simply copies of myths from the surrounding culture, and frankly, resurrection can’t happen because science has proven that miracles are not possible. The story of Jesus is just a re-telling of other myths about dying and rising gods in agrarian Mediterranean societies. Paul wasn’t really an apostle so we can’t trust what he said, and Jesus probably never even existed anyway.”

Notice that the gish galloper has introduced several possibly related but unsupported statements which no person with a life or a real job would be able to sit down and answer in one sitting—it would take all day! There are a few different ways to handle a gish galloper but the simplest would be to stay within the scope of your original claim. You didn’t make any claims about the Bible, flood or creation narratives, or Paul’s status as an apostle. You DID make a claim about a miracle, so that’s a good place to start.

Conclusion:

It’s easy for any of us to fall into some of these traps, so be looking for these 5 illogical people as you interact on social media—and be careful to not be one yourself!

Tag Archive for: Alisa Childers

Recursos recomendados en Español:

“YOU SHOULDN’T JUDGE.”

SAYING “DON’T JUDGE” IS NOT BIBLICAL.

JUDGE THE FRUIT

SAYING “DON’T JUDGE” IS NOT LOGICAL.

SAYING “DON’T JUDGE” IS NOT LOVING.

COURAGEOUS JUDGMENT

Recommended resources related to the topic:

“YOU SHOULD NOT JUDGE”

SAYING “DO NOT JUDGE” IS NOT BIBLICAL

JUDGE THE FRUIT

SAYING “DO NOT JUDGE” IS NOT LOGICAL

SAYING “DON’T JUDGE” IS NOT LOVING

BRAVE JUDGMENT

Recommended resources in Spanish:

1. Defendieron el evangelio, no a ellos mismos.

2. Ellos compartieron evidencia de testigos oculares de la resurrección de Jesús, no sus testimonios personales.

3. Ellos conocían las Escrituras pero en ocasiones no lo utilizaban inmediatamente.

Conclusión:

Recursos recomendados en Español:

2. They shared eyewitness evidence of Jesus’ resurrection, not their personal testimonies.

Conclusion:

Recommended resources related to the topic:

1. The Straw Man

2. The Red Herring or the Red Lure

3. The Slanderer

4. The Self-Destructor

5. The Gish or Machine Gun Gallop

Conclusion :

Recommended resources in Spanish:

Content

Audience

Other Thoughts

Conclusion

Recommended resources related to the topic:

Recommended resources related to the topic:

​1. The Historian

​2. The Atheist

3. The Skeptic

​4. The Theologian

​5. The Ex-con

​​​​​References:

Recommended resources related to the topic:

2. The Red Herring

​3. The Character Assassinator

​4. The Self-Defeater

Conclusion:

Recommended resources related to the topic:

1. The Historian

2. The Atheist

4. The Theologian

5. The Ex-con

References:

3. The Character Assassinator

4. The Self-Defeater