Essential DNA Required for Life

ByĀ Philip Carlson

If one believes in evolution, it is important to know what is required for life. Not just what environmental conditions are needed, but also what biochemical conditions.

It is often quoted that there are 250 essential proteins required for basic life. To have life, you need 250 proteins so it was thought. While those were previous guesses it is now possible to determine what parts of DNA are essential for life. AĀ studyĀ released in the journalĀ Molecular Systems BiologyĀ provides a method of testing just that. Not only Ā do they give a method they also performed the test on a ā€œsimpleā€ bacterium (Caulobacter crescentus).Ā 

DNA Required Life

The complete genome of this bacterium was sequenced in 2001. Which helpsĀ tremendously with the task ofĀ determiningĀ which parts are essential for its survival. It is important to know that just because the genome was sequenced does not mean that the function of all the pieces is known, just that theĀ nucleobase sequence that makes up the DNA is known.

With the bacteria in hand, these researchers from the Stanford University School of Medicine took a close look at exactly what parts of DNA are required for this bacteria to live in the lab.

ā€œThis work addresses a fundamental question in biology: What is essential for life?ā€ saidĀ Beat Christen, PhD, one of the co-first authors of the new paper and a postdoctoral scholar in developmental biology. ā€œWe came up with a method to identify all the parts of the genome required for life.ā€(1)

What is essential for life from a biochemical standpoint? They came up with some interesting conclusions which dwarf the previous estimates.

In total, the essentialĀ CaulobacterĀ genome was 492,941 base pairs long and included 480 protein-coding genes that were clustered in two regions of the chromosome. The researchers also identified 402 essential promoter regions that increase or decrease the activity of those genes, and 130 segments of DNA that do not code for proteins but have other roles in modifying bacterial metabolism or reproduction. Of the individual DNA regions identified as essential, 91 were non-coding regions of unknown function and 49 were genes coding proteins whose function is unknown. (1)

We are told, ā€œthat 12 percent of the bacteriaā€™s genetic material is essential for survival under laboratory conditions.ā€ (1) Sounds like a small percentage overall, but keep in mind that thisĀ essentialĀ genome was 492,941 base pairs long. These are base pairs that are needed for life in this bacterium. This means that 985,882 amino acids were needed in the correct arrangement to allow life for this bacterium. The implications this has for the unaided formation of the first life are staggering. (While we could stop here and calculate theĀ apparentĀ overly absurd odds of this happening, such a calculation would serve little purpose. As a side note, creationist literature often attempts to calculate the absurd odds of things happening the way evolutions claim. Many set up straw men with these types of processes. I think that more often than not those types of calculations oversimplify the problems andĀ ashamedlyĀ make a caricature of theĀ opponentsĀ position. This type of ā€œargumentationā€ is best left off the table if any real headway is to be made with this issue. While I do believe that such odds could be calculated at a rudimentary level, it could never be done to complete satisfaction without knowing all the factors involved. We do know, however, that the improbability is greatly increased because of the sheer number of correctly sequenced amino acids needed.) The researches did find 480 protein coding regions that are essential. This nearly doubles the previous estimates of how many proteins are needed for life. While is is a bit of an extrapolation to say that all of those 480 proteins are needed for life I think we can say that if that part of the DNA is needed it stands to reason that so are those proteins. They also found 91 essential coding regions and 49 coding regions that have unknown function.

ā€œThere were many surprises in the analysis of the essential regions ofĀ Caulobacterā€™s genome,ā€ saidĀ Lucy Shapiro, PhD, the paperā€™s senior author. ā€œFor instance, we found 91 essential DNA segments where we have no idea what they do. These may provide clues to lead us to new and completely unknown bacterial functions.ā€ Shapiro is a professor of developmental biology and the director of theĀ Beckman Center for Molecular and Genetic MedicineĀ at Stanford. (1)

These 91 essential DNA segments that are of unknown function were still found to be essential to life! This reminds me of the oldĀ vestigialĀ organs argument often used in support of evolution. That is right, just because we donā€™t know the function does not means there isnā€™t one. See theĀ previousĀ discussion onĀ pseudogenesĀ for another example of that type of thinking.

This new research helps to contribute to our (mis)understanding of an evolutionary origin of life, and, I think, push us toward accepting that the transcendent creator did not use evolution to bring about life.

1.Ā Digitale, E. ā€œNew method reveals parts of bacterium genome essential to lifeā€. Stanford School of Medicine news release, August 30, 2011,Ā http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2011/august/shapiro.html

Christian Apologetics Alliance BLOG Banner

Visite here CAA here


Resrouce for Greater Impact

Signature in the Cell (DVD)

Darwin Dilemma

Darwin’s Dilemma (DVD)


Print

Free CrossExamined.org Resource

Get the first chapter of "Stealing From God: Why Atheists Need God to Make Their Case" in PDF.

Powered by ConvertKit

Facebook Comments