By Colin Burgess

Aristotle opened his philosophical work, the Metaphysics, with the following sentence: “All men by nature desire to know.” Nothing could be truer; it is when one begins to ask the “why” questions that one is taking on the intellectual responsibility of constructing one’s weltanschauung, or worldview. One does not take one’s thoughts or beliefs for granted, but rebels against one’s upbringing and no longer embraces them through dogma, adopted as a child, through education and indoctrination, but makes these beliefs one’s own by examining them categorically. This is not to say that the beliefs passed on to us from early childhood are wrong, but those who examine them closely try to give them some kind of justification. Thanks to philosophy we can have a discussion with long-dead thinkers such as Plato, Marx, and the apostle Paul, and by interpreting their views, as accurately as possible, we can see what they were saying as if they were sitting in front of us. By doing this carefully we can abandon the politics and religion of our parents, or examine them more deeply and make them truly our own.

It is often said that children make the best philosophers. Perhaps it is because they ask questions honestly and without censorship. As we grow up, our thoughts tend to reach a state of entropy, and we no longer seek justification for beliefs, but are content to think only as much as is necessary to get through our daily routine, so our minds begin to atrophy. Too often we let celebrities, politicians, clerics and newscasters tell us what to think, rather than learning, for ourselves, how to think, while eating dinner in front of the television. Is this what Socrates meant when he said, “The unexamined life is not worth living”? He did not mean that those who do not examine their thoughts should commit suicide, but that those who do not live an examined life are living without purpose, and are basically marking time, waiting for death.

We may wake up from our intellectual slumber long enough to seek a justification for defending certain social opinions we hold, or at election time when we defend our voting decisions to ourselves, our family and our friends, but then once the dust has settled many of us are too busy or content to sit back and go about our business as normal. Surely it is not due to stupidity, many of these people are our doctors and lawyers, or people highly skilled in their trades. Maybe it is because we do not live in a “food for thought” economy, that no one gives us a cent for our thoughts, so we do not engage in the art of sorting them out simply because there are bills to pay and our children are hungry, and short of a philosophy factory being built there is little chance that many of us, except the select few, will rise to the heights of academia where we will pay them a penny for their thoughts. Some consider themselves philosophers or have taken a module or two in philosophy as part of an academic requirement, but many find philosophy difficult, or even boring.

Many have a misconception of what philosophy is, not realizing that we are all philosophers even if we are not familiar with the terminology; many think that philosophy is about scratching one’s flea-ridden beard, sitting down to ponder obtuse questions that have no definitive answer. While this has been the case in the history of philosophy, it is certainly not normative. While in the discipline of philosophy there is no consensus on many issues, philosophers do try to address very real issues that affect our society today, such as in the fields of ethics and medical research, where there are political philosophers who examine political ideas and their effects on society. Law school is grounded in philosophy, and many lawyers are required to study it in order to reason through a set of premises and formulate well-reasoned arguments. In the sciences, philosophy functions as a tool to define what science is and how we should think about the world being studied. 

There is no need to make philosophy out of nothing, many philosophers today stand on the shoulders of giants, and we can see how thinkers of the past dealt with problems similar to those we face today, which saves us the effort of reinventing the wheel, and allows us to continue where they left off.

In a nutshell, philosophy can be summed up into four broad periods: the ancient philosophers, the pre-Socratics, the Socratics, and the medieval philosophers. All of these philosophers dealt with their own experience of the world, and if one reads a tome on the history of Western philosophy, one can get a comprehensive idea, after the fact, of how they tried to deal with the issues of their time. These philosophers, ranging from Aristotle to Nietzsche, grappled with questions related to metaphysics (what is real), epistemology (theory of knowledge), ethics (how we should behave), existentialism (who we are), and logic (how we should think). How one answers these questions will determine one’s views on God, politics, and many other aspects of life, and if one opens an introductory philosophy text, one will eventually see similarities in their views or thoughts to the way the ancients thought, to some extent. 

This is not about defending any particular view of ethics, metaphysics, or religion, but about defending and encouraging the art of thinking carefully and ordering our thoughts and being more aware of our beliefs, so that they can be held with a greater degree of intentionality and justification and not taken for granted.

For those who want to briefly examine philosophy without committing to an expensive book on the subject, Douglas Groothuis has written an excellent, concise book summarizing the most famous philosophers and their famous sayings, in Philosophy in Seven Sentences. And for those who wish to explore further, I found Philosophy for Beginners very informative and accessible. While Bertrand Russell has written an excellent history of Western philosophy, Anthony Kenny has written a New History of Western Philosophy, covering both more contemporary and older philosophers.

Recommended resources in Spanish:

Stealing from God ( Paperback ), ( Teacher Study Guide ), and ( Student Study Guide ) by Dr. Frank Turek

Why I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist ( Complete DVD Series ), ( Teacher’s Workbook ), and ( Student’s Handbook ) by Dr. Frank Turek

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Original source of the Blog: https://bit.ly/3gm5JkR 

Translated by Monica Pirateque

Edited by Elenita Romero

 

By Josh Klein

The Church of Satan was started by Anton Lavey in 1966[i] as an atheistic religious organization focused on hedonism and lawful citizenry. Adherents to the Church of Satan claim not to believe in Satan or worship him but to strive for what they call “ethical egoism.”  Ironically, Satan’s most effective tool against humanity is not convincing people to worship him, but to worship themselves in leu of the Almighty God.

Whether Lavey knew it or not, in effect, he did establish a church of Satan that worships the very thing Satan wishes it would.  It matters not to Satan what people think of him, but if he can get people to believe in themselves and scoff at the idea of God then his mission is accomplished.

In the garden, Satan never asks Eve to worship him, he simply seeks to destroy Eve’s relationship with her creator.

It is not this obvious satanic movement that threatens the church of America, but a different, more insidious and pernicious Church of Satan that has snuck into the mainstream religious institutions of the day. The true Church of Satan hides in plain sight. Satan’s real strategy against the Bride of Christ is the same as his strategy in the garden and we must call it out for what it is lest we stand idly by as Adam did and watch people be deceived.  You might think this overdramatic, but history and scripture indicate that it is not.  The gates of Hell will not prevail against the church (Matthew 16:18[ii]), but Satan is building a bride for himself within what people consider to be the church in the West and, save for a few, it is rarely challenged with courage.

The church in America is quickly falling into apostacy.  According to a recent study, 60% of self-described American Christians under the age of 40 believe that Jesus is not the only way of salvation.[iii]  Which, one would think, would disqualify them from calling themselves Christians, at least that’s what Jesus would seem to indicate when he said no one can come to the Father except through him (John 14:6[iv]).

In many cases these mainline Christian denominations are not merely getting sin wrong, they are perverting the gospel by glorifying sin, reveling in it, and using scripture to double down on a gospel of affirmation rather than repentance and belief in Christ.

In the 2000s the Episcopalian church in America ordained the first transgender Priest and in 2021 the ELCA ordained their first transgender bishop[v].

In May of 2022 a United Methodist Church in Madison, Wisconsin held a Pride celebration event.[vi]

In December of 2021 a Lutheran church in Chicago had a pastor deliver a message to children dressed in Drag.[vii]

In August of 2022 the First Christian Church in Austin, Texas hosted a “family friendly” Drag Show for the community.[viii]

Most recently though, a United Methodist Church in Florida hosted an Atheist Drag Queen Pastor[ix] (yes, you read that right)[x] for their service, and, particularly, to share his story with the children in the church.

To the Christian the most alarming part of this video should not be the drag queen standing in the church but the “Pastor’s” use of scripture to justify Ms. Penny Cost’s lifestyle as godly:

“Well one of the things that I think is great about miss Penny Cost is that she reminds us that we follow a god who calls us to not conform to the things of this world. That we’re supposed to be transformed by the renewal of our minds, and that means that what I think today may have to change tomorrow if I continue to renew my mind. And it’s so cool that we serve a god that calls us to continue to grow and to continue to change into something new and to not be bound by the ways that the world confines us sometimes. That we are supposed to live differently.”

If one merely read the words spoken by this “Pastor” one might not see anything wrong with this simple directive towards children.  He quotes scripture, directs them to live contrary to the world, and encourages them to live differently. That seems to be in line with historic Christian belief.  This is, however, the oldest trick in the Satanic book. That is not hyperbole.

To use scripture in a way that justifies the pride of life and licentious behavior is the very tactic Satan used with Eve in the garden, and the very tactic he used again in the temptation of Jesus. Satan is not afraid to use scripture to get what he most desires.  He prowls the sidelines waiting for an opportune moment to devour the weak, and he does just that with the misinterpretation and application of scripture (1 Peter 5:8[xi]). If the Devil can get people to believe they are saved through heretical use of scripture, only to embrace the wrong gospel, his digestion is complete and they are doomed.

Jesus hints at this reality himself when he says that not everyone who says to him, “Lord, Lord” will enter the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 7:21[xii]).  There are many that will engage in mercy missions, philanthropy, clothing and feeding the poor, that will have embraced a false gospel that does not save.  This false gospel is Satan’s go to weapon against the church.  Satan does not need Anton Lavey to establish his church. He simply needs to get those that call themselves the church to buy into a gospel of lies and self-fulfillment.

A tail as old as time.

In the garden, the serpent misquotes God to challenge Eve to think only of herself and find fulfillment and hope in creation rather than the Creator (Genesis 3[xiii], Romans 1[xiv]).  In Matthew 4:6[xv] we find Satan again using scripture to try to tempt Jesus in the wilderness.  Satan quotes Psalm 91:11-12[xvi] seemingly to get Jesus to misapply scripture to inflate his own ego above the Father’s plan. Jesus, of course, does not fall for it.

John Piper puts it this way:

“Note well! Satan does not always try to ruin faith by saying, ‘The Bible isn’t true.’ He often tries to destroy our faith by affirming some passage and using it to lead us into disobedience.”[xvii]

If Satan used scripture to entice Eve, and again to seek to derail the redemptive work of God through Jesus, would he not use scripture to create for himself a church of ineffectual sin laden imposters? This is the spirit of antichrist, and it is taking the American church by storm.

The spirit of the antichrist affirms sin, encourages debasement, and blasphemes the name of Jesus (1 John 1:7, 2:18-22, 4:3). The video above accomplishes all these things in the space of fifty seconds. The Devil’s plans to subvert the church are obvious, but his appeal to the nature and pride of mankind blinds many to it.  The misapplication and interpretation of Romans 12:1-2 gives away the Satanic game. We read in 1 John 2:15-24 just the opposite of what this pastor is speaking:

“15 Do not love the world nor the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world. 17 The world is passing away, and also its lusts; but the one who does the will of God lives forever.

18 Children, it is the last hour; and just as you heard that antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have appeared; from this we know that it is the last hour. 19 They went out from us, but they were not really of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they went out, so that it would be shown that they all are not of us.”

This is a sobering reminder that our battle is not against flesh and blood but against the dark forces of this world (Ephesians 6:12). It is no longer tenable to call this progressive movement in churches Christian.  These are not progressive Christians, they are progressive antichristians. They hold on to a form of godliness yet deny its power (2 Timothy 3:1-5), they are swayed by and leading people astray into empty, deceitful philosophies according to human traditions and the elemental spirits of the world (Colossians 2:8), and they love what is evil and hate what is good (Romans 12:9).

The Satanic church is all around us and claiming Christ as their own in order to obfuscate the gospel.  We must not acquiesce or give quarter to such blatant apostacy.  Paul says we should have nothing to do with them (2 Timothy 3:5) and Jesus indicates that such men, claiming to be agents of the Lord, will experience an even harsher judgment than others (Luke 17:2).

I want to be clear, my quibble is not against those attracted by this false gospel.  My heart breaks for them.  The reason the Christian church’s response to such heresy ought to be swift and decisive is for them. Filled with mercy, patience, and grace (Jude 1:22-24).  The question they are asking is a legitimate one: “How can I be happy, fulfilled, full of purpose?” The answer is there to be had and confused individuals must be met with love, understanding, encouragement, and most importantly, truth.

We must call these people to repentance; we must not allow them to glory in their sin and pervert the gospel.  Winsomeness is not a tool to tolerate blasphemy but to attract those seeking answers. It is winsome to call out error and preach repentance in Christ (Romans 2:4).

The true Church is to be salt and light (Matthew 5:13-16).  Salt preserves the godliness of the generations and light exposes the deeds of darkness (1 John 1).

We can give no quarter to those that would pervert the gospel of Jesus Christ. There is a time for boldness in the faith, and that time is now, and if we are ridiculed, persecuted, or derided for our faithfulness to the true gospel then we are in good company (Hebrews 11, Acts 5:42, 2 Timothy 3:11-12, Matthew 5:10-12).

We must start calling these types of progressive churches what they are, and we must not apologize, because it is true kindness to shed light on the deeds of darkness to beseech them to repent and return to the love they have lost (1 Corinthians 5:5, Revelation 2).

I think Kevin DeYoung put it well:

Stay strong. Fight the good fight, finish the course, and keep the faith.

(2 Timothy 4:7-8)

Footnotes

[i] https://www.britannica.com/biography/Anton-LaVey

[ii] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+16%3A18&version=NET

[iii] https://www.christianpost.com/news/60-of-young-adults-say-jesus-isnt-the-only-way-to-salvation.html

[iv] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+14%3A6&version=NET

[v] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_Partridge#:~:text=Cameron%20Partridge%20(born%201973)%20is,National%20Cathedral%20in%20Washington%2C%20D.C. –

 https://www.npr.org/2021/09/11/1036371531/evangelical-lutheran-church-first-transgender-bishop-megan-rohrer

[vi] https://madison365.com/sherman-church-to-celebrate-pride-month-with-pride-month-flag-raising-ceremony/

[vii] https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lutheran-church-offers-drag-queen-prayer-time-to-children

[viii] https://www.houstonchronicle.com/neighborhood/katy/article/church-lgbtq-drag-shows-17395546.php

[ix] https://www.mspennycost.com/

[x] https://www.theblaze.com/news/drag-queen-pastor-god-is-nothing

[xi] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Peter+5%3A8&version=NET

[xii] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+7%3A21&version=NET

[xiii] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+3&version=NET

[xiv] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+1&version=NET

[xv] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+4%3A6&version=NET

[xvi] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm+91%3A11-12&version=NET

[xvii] https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/satans-bible-knowledge

Recommended resources related to the topic:

Is Morality Absolute or Relative? by Dr. Frank Turek DVD, Mp3 and Mp4

Another Gospel? by Alisa Childers (book)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Josh Klein is a Pastor from Omaha, Nebraska with over a decade of ministry experience. He graduated with an MDiv from Sioux Falls Seminary and spends his spare time reading and engaging with current and past theological and cultural issues. He has been married for 12 years to Sharalee Klein and they have three young children.

Original Blog Source: https://bit.ly/3X2WW7X 

 

By Al Serrato

The Oscar-winning blockbuster Avatar is back in theaters in anticipation of the release of a sequel, once again wowing audiences with its 3D special effects. The plot, an allegory about the evils of corporate greed, thrusts a paraplegic space marine – Jake Sully – into a role pivotal to the future of the native population of a lush moon circling a distant star. Inhabiting his hybrid Avatar body on this distant world, Jake is forced to choose between doing his “duty” and protecting aliens to whom he is growing increasingly attached.

What does the film have to do with Christian apologetics? Very little, on the surface. But stories are often the best way to get a point across. With apathy and hostility two common responses to the Christian message, using a popular film to make an apologetics point can be an effective evangelical tool. Perhaps a film like Avatar can make a point about a very controversial topic: how it is a “loving” God can allow people to spend eternity in Hell.

Making this point involves recognizing that Hell is not a place of torture but is instead a place of torment brought on by separation[i] from an infinitely perfect – and therefore infinitely desirable – Being. Life in our current bodies is, in a sense, like living on Jake’s ship. Our bodies, like Jake’s, are quite limited, and not at all suited for life on the “world” – heaven-  that is our destination. The ship we inhabit is capable of supporting us, and for providing the means of transition to a fuller life. In the movie, that transition involves a rather arduous conversion. Anyone on board can conceivably master the means of escape, the “pod” that serves as the interface between the ship and the lush garden world, but using the pod requires self-discipline and training. Not everyone will be willing to undergo the rigors of this process.

We are all free to reject the pod training, but if we do that, we have no choice but to stay within the confines of a room in the ship. With nothing much else to do, and no other way to make it to the garden paradise, we remain trapped on the inside, spending eternity thinking about…ourselves. To get out into the new physical world, by contrast, we need to look outside ourselves. We need to be willing to think of others, and to sacrifice. The struggle is worth the effort: on this other world, there is unlimited opportunity to live forever in a perfected body with others that we know and love. The choice is ours: from inside the ship, we are separated and inward looking; we can never unite with those on the new world.

Contrary to what many modern critics of Christianity believe, God is not in the business of punishing people to satisfy some sadistic desire. But this current life on this beautiful planet we call home is not the destination – it is instead merely the ship we inhabit for a time. The journey may at times be arduous, but it was never meant to be the final destination. In the end, God does all the work in transforming us into our Avatars. But we must willingly enter the pod, and begin the process of shedding our old, selfish selves and looking outward. We must take the step. He will not force it upon us. If we do, He offers unlimited rewards. If we don’t, well… we end up with what we are asking for – agonizing separation from the source of all life and goodness, and ultimately complete loneliness.

But for many, despite the rewards, the cost seems too high. They reject the option of loving God, and loving their neighbor, because they prefer to always be “in control.” “No one is going to tell me what to do,” they say, as they adopt the words of Frank Sinatra’s famous song “My Way” as their theme. Instead of submitting to the One who brought them into being, they instead concentrate on loving themselves, a futile and unrewarding task if ever there was one, never realizing that the best way to achieve happiness is to stop seeking it and concentrate on doing good for others instead. Choosing their own pleasure at every turn, they seldom stop to realize what they are giving up along the way. In the end, those who choose to stay on the ship – to stay walled in and to think only of themselves – cannot complain that God did not force them into the pod, and into heaven. They will have only themselves to blame.

A bit strained, admittedly. And probably not too useful to teach doctrine or present the Good News. But a first step, perhaps, in engaging a nonbeliever by talking about something to which they can relate.

Footnotes

[i] https://crossexamined.org/is-hell-torment-or-torture-and-is-there-a-difference/

Recommended resources related to the topic:

Hell? The Truth about Eternity (MP3 Set), (DVD Set), and (Mp4 Download Set) by Dr. Frank Turek 

Short Answers to Long Questions (DVD) and (mp4 Download) by Dr. Frank Turek

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Al Serrato earned his law degree from the University of California at Berkeley in 1985. He began his career as an FBI special agent before becoming a prosecutor in California, where he worked for 33 years. An introduction to CS Lewis’ works sparked his interest in Apologetics, which he has pursued for the past three decades. He got his start writing Apologetics with J. Warner Wallace and Pleaseconvinceme.com

 

 

What makes human life so valuable? What makes us different than everything else in God’s creation? If there is no God, what’s the purpose of life? Those are just some of the questions Frank and Dr. Jeff Myers of Summit Ministries tackle in this midweek podcast episode.

Jeff also gives us some tips, strategies, and key questions to ask when sharing the truth of the Gospel with others or when you’re being challenged for your faith. These practical applications will give you the confidence to speak the truth (and be nice at the same time!) whether you’re standing around the water cooler, at the Thanksgiving table, in the halls at school, or anywhere in the public square!

For more information on this topic, be sure to check out our podcast with Jeff from last week and his brand-new book, Truth Changes Everything: How People of Faith Can Transform the World in Times of Crisis.

Jeff’s book: https://a.co/d/cx1PYyv
Summit Ministries: https://www.summit.org/

If you would like to submit a question to be answered on the show, please email your question to Hello@Crossexamined.org.

Subscribe on Apple Podcast: http://bit.ly/CrossExamined_Podcast Rate and review! Thanks!!!
Subscribe on Google Play: https://cutt.ly/0E2eua9
Subscribe on Spotify: http://bit.ly/CrossExaminedOfficial_Podcast
Subscribe on Stitcher: http://bit.ly/CE_Podcast_Stitcher

 

 

Download Transcript

 

Is all hope lost? Have we finally reached the point of no return in America? From at least the time of the ancient Hebrews, people have believed that objective truth exists and can be discovered. Now the balance has tipped in the other direction, with more than half of all Americans claiming that truth is based on how we see things rather than on what exists to be seen. Learning to “speak our truths” was supposed to lead to dignity and harmony. But instead, our society struggles with unprecedented levels of social conflict, purposeless, and loss of identity.

In his inspiring new book, Truth Changes Everything: How People of Faith Can Transform the World in Times of Crisis, Dr. Jeff Myers of Summit Ministries gives us a glimpse of what it looks like when smart, determined people live as if Jesus really is the Truth. This book is bursting with fascinating true stories of people from science, the arts, medicine, politics, and everything in between, who had the courage to live for Truth and transformed their world in times of crisis.

Together, Frank and Jeff explore the questions: Does the truth matter? Can truth be known and how do we discover what truth really is? Jeff also shares some real-life examples from his book where Christians changed the world of science and politics, and how we can do the same amid the unique challenges of our current age. If you feel like the world has gone crazy and don’t know what to do about it, you need to listen in and then get yourself a copy of Jeff’s book!

To view the entire VIDEO PODCAST, be sure to join our CrossExamined private community. It’s the perfect place to jump into some great discussions with like-minded Christians (including Frank) while simultaneously providing financial support for our ministry.

Jeff’s book: https://a.co/d/cx1PYyv
Summit Ministries: https://www.summit.org/

If you would like to submit a question to be answered on the show, please email your question to Hello@Crossexamined.org.

Subscribe on Apple Podcast: http://bit.ly/CrossExamined_Podcast Rate and review! Thanks!!!
Subscribe on Google Play: https://cutt.ly/0E2eua9
Subscribe on Spotify: http://bit.ly/CrossExaminedOfficial_Podcast
Subscribe on Stitcher: http://bit.ly/CE_Podcast_Stitcher

 

Por Dr Jonathan McLatchie

Un punto importante de controversia en relación con el libro de Hebreos es si un creyente genuino puede perder su salvación, o si el alejamiento de la fe simplemente evidencia el hecho de que uno nunca había llegado a participar verdaderamente de la fe en Cristo. En el centro de esta controversia están los pasajes de advertencia, que se encuentran en Hebreos 2:1-4, 3:7-4:13, 5:11-6:12, 10:19-39 y 12:14-29. El propósito de este artículo es evaluar la evidencia bíblica, con un enfoque particular en el libro de Hebreos, sobre si un cristiano profeso que se aleja de la fe pierde su salvación.

Un punto importante de controversia en relación con el libro de Hebreos es si un creyente genuino puede perder su salvación, o si el alejamiento de la fe simplemente evidencia el hecho de que uno nunca había llegado a participar verdaderamente de la fe en Cristo. En el centro de esta controversia están los pasajes de advertencia, que se encuentran en Hebreos 2:1-4, 3:7-4:13, 5:11-6:12, 10:19-39 y 12:14-29. El propósito de este artículo es evaluar la evidencia bíblica, con un enfoque particular en el libro de Hebreos, sobre si un cristiano profeso que se aleja de la fe pierde su salvación.

Un principio fundamental de la hermenéutica bíblica es que los pasajes poco claros deben interpretarse siempre a la luz de los textos más claros. Esto se desprende de la premisa de que los textos bíblicos, al ser de inspiración divina, aunque compuestos por diferentes autores, son una unidad. Es decir, son internamente consistentes en todo lo que enseñan. Por lo tanto, al interpretar textos difíciles y muy debatidos del libro de Hebreos, debemos preguntarnos primero qué enseñan el resto de las Escrituras sobre este tema. Lo ideal sería analizar otros libros del mismo autor, para que nos ilumine el significado pretendido que probablemente tenga el libro que nos interesa. Desafortunadamente, la autoría de Hebreos es muy debatida entre los académicos del Nuevo Testamento y no se ha alcanzado un consenso claro. Sin embargo, independientemente del autor o autores reales, el texto muestra indicios de reflejar el pensamiento paulino, y es muy probable que fuera compuesto por un asociado de Pablo, si no por el mismo. [i] Un examen del corpus paulino, por tanto, puede darnos una idea de la teología más amplia del autor de Hebreos. A continuación, debemos examinar el propio libro de Hebreos para determinar si otros textos, además de los pasajes de advertencia que estamos investigando, aportan luz a la cuestión que nos ocupa. Por último, nos corresponde analizar el contexto de cada uno de los cinco pasajes de advertencia, y cómo encajan en el flujo argumental general del libro de Hebreos.

Breve estudio del Nuevo Testamento como un todo

Se podría escribir mucho sobre lo que el Nuevo Testamento tiene que decir sobre la seguridad eterna. Sin embargo, como el enfoque de este artículo es el libro de Hebreos, mantendré mis comentarios breves. Varias afirmaciones en los evangelios parecen indicar firmemente que uno no puede perder su salvación. Por ejemplo, Jesús afirmó que “Todo lo que el Padre me da, vendrá a mí; y al que viene a mí, de ningún modo lo echaré fuera … Y esta es la voluntad del que me envió: que de todo lo que Él me ha dado yo no pierda nada, sino que lo resucite en el día final. Porque esta es la voluntad de mi Padre: que todo aquel que ve al Hijo y cree en Él, tenga vida eterna, y yo mismo lo resucitaré en el día final.” (Juan 6:37-40). Thomas R. Schreiner observa que “el paralelismo establece que venir y creer son sinónimos. Así, decir que aquellos que El Padre da, ‘vendrán’ al Hijo significa también que ‘creerán’ en el Hijo”[ii]. Jesús también afirmó que “Nadie puede venir a mí si no lo trae el Padre que me envió, y yo lo resucitaré en el día final” (Juan 6:44). Las dos referencias a “lo” en este versículo se refieren claramente al mismo individuo, es decir, al que fue traído. La implicación es que el que es traído será finalmente resucitado en el último día. Jesús continúa diciendo, “Mis ovejas oyen mi voz, y yo las conozco y me siguen;  y yo les doy vida eterna y jamás perecerán, y nadie las arrebatará de mi mano.  Mi Padre que me las dio es mayor que todos, y nadie las puede arrebatar de la mano del Padre.” (Juan 10:27-29). En griego, la frase que denota “jamás perecerán” es οὐ μὴ ἀπόλωνται εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα. La expresión οὐ μὴ es un doble negativo, usado en griego para enfatizar. Por lo tanto, se puede traducir mejor “nunca jamás perecerán”. De nuevo, esto apoya la doctrina de la seguridad eterna.

Un posible contraejemplo que se puede dar a estos textos en los evangelios es la caída de Judas, uno de los Doce. Sin embargo, Juan 6:64-65 sugiere que Judas no era un auténtico creyente incluso antes de su traición a Jesús: “Pero hay algunos de vosotros que no creéis. Porque Jesús sabía desde el principio quiénes eran los que no creían, y quién era el que le iba a traicionar. Y decía: Por eso os he dicho que nadie puede venir a mí si no se lo ha concedido el Padre.” El uso de la expresión “Διὰ τοῦτο…” (“Por eso os he dicho”) enlaza el verso 65 con el 64, indicando que la razón por la que Jesús sabía de antemano quiénes abandonarían la fe es porque él preconocía a quiénes les había concedido el Padre la capacidad de venir a Jesús. El episodio del lavamiento de los pies en la última cena añade más respaldo a la idea de que Judas de hecho, no era un creyente antes de la traición: “Jesús le dijo: El que se ha bañado no necesita lavarse, excepto los pies, pues está todo limpio; y vosotros estáis limpios, pero no todos.” (Juan 13:10).

Múltiples textos fuera de los evangelios también apoyan la doctrina de la seguridad eterna. En 1 Juan 2:19, el apóstol Juan también habla de los falsos profetas, diciendo, “Salieron de nosotros, pero en realidad no eran de nosotros, porque si hubieran sido de nosotros, habrían permanecido con nosotros; pero salieron, a fin de que se manifestara que no todos son de nosotros.” Esto es consistente con el punto de vista de que caer no es una pérdida de la salvación, sino más bien una evidencia de que uno nunca ha caminado verdaderamente con Cristo. La única interpretación alternativa viable de este texto es leerlo como que “salieron de nosotros porque ya no eran de nosotros” Sin embargo, esto es un alegato especial, ya que la palabra griega οὐκέτι (“ya no”) está completamente ausente en este pasaje.

Pedro señala que los creyentes “sois protegidos por el poder de Dios mediante la fe, para la salvación que está preparada para ser revelada en el último tiempo.” (1 Pedro 1:5). La frase “ sois protegidos” (φρουρουμένους) expresa el concepto de que la herencia del creyente es preservada por Dios. Sin embargo, 2 Pedro también contiene un pasaje de advertencia contra la caída que no es diferente de los que se encuentran en Hebreos (2 Pedro 2:20-22): “Porque si después de haber escapado de las contaminaciones del mundo por el conocimiento de nuestro Señor y Salvador Jesucristo, de nuevo son enredados en ellas y vencidos, su condición postrera viene a ser peor que la primera. Pues hubiera sido mejor para ellos no haber conocido el camino de la justicia, que habiéndolo conocido, apartarse del santo mandamiento que les fue dado.  Les ha sucedido a ellos según el proverbio verdadero: El perro vuelve a su propio vómito, y: La puerca lavada, vuelve a revolcarse en el cieno.” Pedro, pues, parece sostener tanto que la salvación está condicionada a la permanencia en la fe como que los que son salvos perseverarán hasta el final.

¿Y que del corpus paulino? ¿Proporciona algún apoyo adicional a la seguridad eterna? Un texto útil aquí es la declaración de Pablo a los cristianos de Filipos de que “estando convencido precisamente de esto: que el que comenzó en vosotros la buena obra, la perfeccionará hasta el día de Cristo Jesús.” (Filipenses 1:6). Del mismo modo, Pablo dice a los cristianos de Corinto que Cristo “el cual también os confirmará hasta el fin, para que seáis irreprensibles en el día de nuestro Señor Jesucristo.” (1 Corintios 1:8, cf.   Tesalonicenses 5:23-24). Estas afirmaciones parecen apuntar en la dirección de que la perseverancia en la fe es realizada por Dios mismo. Pablo también escribe a los romanos que “Porque a los que de antemano conoció, también los predestinó a ser hechos conforme a la imagen de su Hijo, para que Él sea el primogénito entre muchos hermanos; y a los que predestinó, a ésos también llamó; y a los que llamó, a ésos también justificó; y a los que justificó, a ésos también glorificó.” (Romanos 8:29-30). Este texto establece una cadena ininterrumpida de redención desde el preconocimiento activo de Dios hasta el llamado del creyente, pasando por su justificación y glorificación final. En otras palabras, todos los que son llamados y justificados por Dios serán ciertamente glorificados.

Sin embargo, para el presente estudio también hay pasajes de advertencia que se encuentran en el corpus paulino. Por ejemplo, Pablo escribe “sin embargo, ahora Él os ha reconciliado en su cuerpo de carne, mediante su muerte, a fin de presentaros santos, sin mancha e irreprensibles delante de Él, si en verdad permanecéis en la fe bien cimentados y constantes, sin moveros de la esperanza del evangelio que habéis oído, que fue proclamado a toda la creación debajo del cielo, y del cual yo, Pablo, fui hecho ministro.” (Colosenses 1:22-23). Pablo también escribe, “Porque no quiero que ignoréis, hermanos, que nuestros padres todos estuvieron bajo la nube y todos pasaron por el mar; y en Moisés todos fueron bautizados en la nube y en el mar; y todos comieron el mismo alimento espiritual; y todos bebieron la misma bebida espiritual, porque bebían de una roca espiritual que los seguía; y la roca era Cristo. Sin embargo, Dios no se agradó de la mayor parte de ellos, pues quedaron tendidos en el desierto.” (1 Corintios 10:1-5). La afirmación de la seguridad eterna, junto con la afirmación de que la salvación está condicionada a la perseverancia, es algo que también se encuentra en Hebreos, como veremos. Sin embargo, Pablo mantiene juntas esas dos ideas aparentemente contradictorias. Escribe sobre el evangelio “por el cual también sois salvos, si retenéis la palabra que os prediqué, a no ser que hayáis creído en vano.” (Corintios 15:2). En otras palabras, aunque la salvación está condicionada a la perseverancia en la fe, un verdadero creyente no dejará de perseverar. Por supuesto, esto plantea una pregunta sobre el propósito de los pasajes de advertencia en Hebreos y el resto del Nuevo Testamento: ¿Por qué hay que advertir si no hay peligro de caer? Volveré sobre esta cuestión más adelante en este artículo.

Un análisis de textos claros en el libro de Hebreos

Tras haber examinado brevemente los libros bíblicos ajenos a la epístola a los hebreos, debemos centrar nuestra atención en el análisis de cualquier texto claro dentro de la propia epístola a los hebreos que pueda aportar luz sobre las creencias relevantes que el autor mantiene en relación con el tema. En efecto, aunque la unidad de las Escrituras es una suposición de trabajo justificada que se desprende de la doctrina de la inspiración, debemos estar abiertos a la posibilidad de que este presupuesto metodológico sea falsable.

El autor de Hebreos nos dice que una consecuencia necesaria de ser partícipes de Cristo es mantener “firme hasta el fin el principio de nuestra seguridad” (Hebreos 3:14). La implicación aquí es que si alguno no persevera en la fe entonces ese individuo no ha llegado a ser partícipe de Cristo – confirmando las numerosas declaraciones en otros escritos del Nuevo Testamento y por lo tanto apoyando nuestra suposición de trabajo de la unidad de las Escrituras. De hecho, “una cuidadosa atención a la redacción muestra que estas líneas no mencionan lo que será cierto para quienes que se mantienen, sino lo que ya es cierto de ellos, si verdaderamente perduran. Su resistencia a la tentación será la prueba de su conexión vital con Cristo. El escritor afirma que su permanencia en la fe demostrará que son miembros de la casa de Dios, no que llegarán a serlo en el futuro. Mantener su confianza revelará la realidad que ya han llegado a compartir en Cristo, no que la llegarán a compartir. Al continuar en la fe, demuestran también la obra que Cristo ya ha comenzado y que ciertamente completará en ellos.” [iii]

Otro texto relevante en Hebreos es la afirmación del autor de que “Por lo cual Él [Cristo] también es poderoso para salvar para siempre a los que por medio de Él se acercan a Dios, puesto que vive perpetuamente para interceder por ellos.” (Hebreos 7:25). Esto presenta un enigma teológico para el punto de vista de que la salvación puede perderse al caer, ya que si Cristo está de pie intercediendo en nombre de los que son suyos y sin embargo están cayendo, la conclusión parece inevitable que la intercesión y las oraciones del Hijo están siendo rechazadas por el Padre, lo que implica una disensión dentro de la divinidad.

Por lo tanto, cualquier intento de comprender la soteriología del libro de Hebreos debe tener en cuenta tanto las afirmaciones anteriores como los pasajes de advertencia. A estos pasajes de advertencia me referiré ahora.

¿Se dirigen los pasajes de advertencia a los auténticos creyentes?

La primera cuestión que debemos abordar es si los pasajes de advertencia se dirigen a los creyentes genuinos y hablan de una caída de alguien que verdaderamente ha creído. Quizás el más famoso de los pasajes de advertencia es el que se encuentra en Hebreos 5:11-6:12. Los versículos 4-6 afirman que “Porque en el caso de los que fueron una vez iluminados, que probaron del don celestial y fueron hechos partícipes del Espíritu Santo,  que gustaron la buena palabra de Dios y los poderes del siglo venidero,  pero después cayeron, es imposible renovarlos otra vez para arrepentimiento, puesto que de nuevo crucifican para sí mismos al Hijo de Dios y le exponen a la ignominia pública.”. El trasfondo contextual de este texto parece mostrar que los destinatarios al que el autor escribía no lograban progresar espiritualmente y se encontraban en un estado de infancia y letargo espiritual (Hebreos 5:11; 6:12). Por lo tanto, el autor les advierte en los términos más enérgicos sobre el peligro de caer, un paso que estaban a punto de dar. De hecho, el autor se refiere constantemente a la potencialidad de dar este paso más que a su propia realidad (Hebreos 2:1; 3:12-13; 4:11, 11, etc.). Así, dice en 6:9 “Pero en cuanto a vosotros, amados, aunque hablemos de esta manera, estamos persuadidos de las cosas que son mejores y que pertenecen a la salvación”.

A lo largo de la predicación de Hebreos, el autor alude al peligro de que su auditorio se aleje o descuide el evangelio de la salvación (Hebreos 2:1,3), de que pierda la confianza y retroceda en la fe (Hebreos 10:35, 38-39). Estaban al borde de la incredulidad y endurecidos por el engaño del pecado (Hebreos 3:12-13,19), la desobediencia (3:18; 4:6, 11) y el rechazo a Dios (Hebreos 12:25). Leemos en 10:26-31 “Porque si continuamos pecando deliberadamente después de haber recibido el conocimiento de la verdad, ya no queda sacrificio alguno por los pecados, sino cierta horrenda expectación de juicio, y la furia de un fuego que ha de consumir a los adversarios. Cualquiera que viola la ley de Moisés muere sin misericordia por el testimonio de dos o tres testigos. ¿Cuánto mayor castigo pensáis que merecerá el que ha hollado bajo sus pies al Hijo de Dios, y ha tenido por inmunda la sangre del pacto por la cual fue santificado, y ha ultrajado al Espíritu de gracia? Pues conocemos al que dijo: Mía es la venganza, yo pagaré. Y otra vez: El Señor juzgará a su pueblo. ¡Horrenda cosa es caer en las manos del Dios vivo! “. El verso 29 habla de cómo el apóstata ha “tenido por inmunda la sangre del pacto por la cual fue santificado”. La interpretación de este texto depende en gran medida de la identificación del referente del pronombre de este versículo. Si el pronombre se refiere al individuo que deliberadamente sigue pecando, entonces esto sugeriría que el texto está hablando de un creyente genuino, que ha pasado por la santificación por la sangre de Cristo, que ha caído en una rebelión consistente contra Dios. Por otra parte, una minoría de intérpretes, para evitar la fuerza de este texto, ha sugerido en cambio que el pronombre del versículo 29 puede referirse a Cristo que fue santificado, ya que se dice antes en la homilía que Cristo “y aunque era Hijo, aprendió obediencia por lo que padeció;” (Hebreos 5:8).[iv] Sin embargo, esto parece ser una interpretación ad hoc. Randy Booth comenta: “Algunos sostienen que las palabras ‘por las que fue santificado’ se refieren a Jesús (véase Juan 17:19). Tal interpretación no puede ser suficientemente apoyada. Además, incluso si se refirieran a Jesús, hay que admitir que la palabra ‘santificar’ se utiliza de forma diferente a la que aparece antes en Heb. 10:14. Seguramente la experiencia de santificación de Jesús es muy diferente a la que experimentamos nosotros”.[v]

Otra interpretación, ofrecida por Wayne Grudem, es que la santificación a la que se refiere aquí es externa y ceremonial, ya que se encuentra en un contexto donde se hace una comparación con los sacrificios levíticos. [vi]Thomas Schreiner señala, de manera correcta en mi opinión, dos problemas con este enfoque. Uno de ellos es que “se podría hacer un argumento similar con respecto a la limpieza de la conciencia, ya que el autor contrasta la limpieza de la conciencia con la proporcionada por el sistema levítico. Por lo tanto, en los propios términos de Grudem es metodológicamente posible que la limpieza de la conciencia sea también externa y no salvadora”.[vii] Schreiner también señala que “el contraste con la santificación levítica tiene la intención de enfatizar la superioridad de la obra de Cristo. El contraste y la comparación con el sistema levítico no indican que la santificación proporcionada por Cristo sea meramente externa, porque a lo largo de Hebreos el antiguo pacto simboliza exteriormente lo que ahora es una realidad interior por medio de Cristo. Grudem, al relegar la santificación en Hebreos 10:29 a la santificación ceremonial, contraviene en realidad uno de los temas principales de Hebreos, a saber, que lo que se anticipó en forma de sombra en el Antiguo Testamento se ha convertido ahora en una realidad en y por el sacrificio de Cristo”.[viii]

Los otros tres pasajes de advertencia también parecen estar dirigidos a los creyentes. En Hebreos 2, el autor advierte a sus lectores para que no “se desvíen” (2:1) ni “descuiden” (2:3) una “salvación tan grande”. Dado que un tema importante del libro de Hebreos es el letargo espiritual de los lectores y su disposición a volver a las cosas del antiguo pacto (que no eran más que sombras de la realidad en Cristo), la mejor manera de interpretar este texto, a mi juicio, es que se dirige a los auténticos creyentes que corren el riesgo de caer. Que esta advertencia se dirige a los creyentes también lo sugiere el uso del pronombre inclusivo ἡμᾶς (“nos”) en Hebreos 2:1.

El pasaje de advertencia de Hebreos 3:7-4:13 también parece estar dirigido a los creyentes, ya que el 3:12 dice “Tened cuidado, hermanos, no sea que en alguno de vosotros haya un corazón malo de incredulidad, para apartarse del Dios vivo”. El hecho de que el autor se dirija a los destinatarios de la advertencia como ἀδελφοί (“hermanos”) sugiere que su exhortación se dirige a los hermanos creyentes.

Por último, la advertencia de Hebreos 12:14-29 se entiende mejor si se dirige a los creyentes. El autor escribe “Vosotros, en cambio, os habéis acercado al monte Sión y a la ciudad del Dios vivo, la Jerusalén celestial, y a miríadas de ángeles, a la asamblea general e iglesia de los primogénitos que están inscritos en los cielos, y a Dios, el Juez de todos, y a los espíritus de los justos hechos ya perfectos,  y a Jesús, el mediador del nuevo pacto, y a la sangre rociada que habla mejor que la sangre de Abel” (Hebreos 12:22-24). Esto sugiere fuertemente que los destinatarios son auténticos creyentes. En el versículo que sigue inmediatamente, el autor dice: “Mirad que no rechacéis al que habla. Porque si aquéllos no escaparon cuando rechazaron al que les amonestó sobre la tierra, mucho menos escaparemos nosotros si nos apartamos de aquel que nos amonesta desde el cielo” (Hebreos 12:25). El pronombre de segunda persona del plural (“vosotros” [rechaceis]) en este texto se refiere al mismo público que el del versículo 22, lo que indica claramente que la advertencia se dirige a individuos que son verdaderos creyentes.

Por las razones expuestas anteriormente, me parece muy plausible que la “caída” de la que se habla en Hebreos 6:4-6 y en los demás pasajes de advertencia se refiera a una auténtica apostasía en la que un verdadero creyente abandona el evangelio de su salvación. Si ese es el caso, entonces parece que la salvación está condicionada a la perseverancia en la fe. Lo que no está tan claro, sin embargo, es si esto implica que un verdadero creyente puede perder su salvación al caer. Es a este interrogante al que me referiré a continuación.

¿Puede un cristiano perder su salvación?

Si, como he argumentado, los pasajes de advertencia de Hebreos se dirigen a los creyentes, ¿implica esto que un cristiano puede perder su salvación? De ser así, tendríamos que reevaluar nuestra presunción metodológica de la unidad de las Escrituras, o reevaluar los numerosos textos del resto del Nuevo Testamento que he argumentado que apoyan la seguridad eterna. Algunos intérpretes han seguido este camino y han argumentado que la pérdida de la salvación es realmente una posibilidad para el creyente. Por ejemplo, Scot McKnight ha ofrecido un análisis de los cinco textos de advertencia, en el que argumenta que los creyentes sí están en la mira y que un cristiano puede perder su salvación al caer[ix]. Howard Marshall del mismo modo argumenta que un cristiano puede perder su salvación al caer, ya que sostiene que los pasajes de advertencia serían desprovistos de su significado si un creyente no pudiera de hecho desviarse de la fe y perder su salvación al hacerlo.[x] Sin embargo, sostiene que caer es la excepción y no la regla, como lo revelan los textos que hablan de la gracia preservadora de Dios. Según Marshall, la relación entre las amenazas y las promesas de Dios es paradójica y no se puede entender[xi]. Marshall también reinterpreta textos fuera del libro de Hebreos que parecen enseñar la seguridad eterna del creyente. Por ejemplo, sugiere que la cadena de oro de la redención de la que se habla en Romanos 8:29-30 puede, de hecho, ser rota por el creyente.[xii]

Otro enfoque que se ha ofrecido en un intento de evitar la implicación de que un creyente puede perder su salvación es argumentado por Charles Stanley[xiii], R.T Kendall[xiv], y Zane C. Hodges [xv] [xvi]. Estos autores argumentan que los pasajes de advertencia, aunque se dirigen a los creyentes, en realidad se refieren a la pérdida de recompensas, o a la pérdida de una vida cristiana feliz y fructífera. Según esta perspectiva, todos los que confiesen a Jesús como Señor se salvarán, sin importar el fruto (o la falta de él) que se produzca en la vida del creyente. Kendall, por ejemplo, sugiere que el reino de Dios del que se habla en textos de advertencia como 1 Corintios 6:9-11 y Gálatas 5:21 no se refiere al cielo, sino a Dios habitando en los corazones de los creyentes[xvii]. Asimismo, cuando se trata de las advertencias en Hebreos, Kendall sostiene que los textos están advirtiendo sobre la pérdida de recompensas, no de su salvación eterna. [xviii] Sin embargo, este enfoque se equivoca al separar la salvación de las buenas obras y la perseverancia en la fe. Numerosos textos del Nuevo Testamento indican que las buenas obras son un acompañamiento necesario de la fe salvadora y proporcionan el fundamento de la seguridad de la propia salvación. De hecho, “Así también la fe por sí misma, si no tiene obras, está muerta” (Santiago 2:17).

Mi opinión es que, aunque los pasajes de advertencia se dirigen efectivamente a los creyentes, y aunque los textos de advertencia se refieren a una auténtica apostasía, un cristiano no puede perder su salvación. Ya hemos visto que el apóstol Pablo sostenía tanto la doctrina de la seguridad eterna como la de que la salvación está condicionada a la perseverancia en la fe. Si esas ideas pueden mantenerse en armonía, entonces no hay razón para pensar que el libro de Hebreos enseña que un cristiano puede perder su salvación.

Yo diría que la clave interpretativa se encuentra en Hebreos 3:14, ya comentado en este documento, que dice: “Porque somos hechos partícipes de Cristo, si es que retenemos firme hasta el fin el principio de nuestra seguridad”. Esto es coherente con lo que se dice en el corpus paulino sobre la apostasía. Por ejemplo, escribe sobre el evangelio: “por el cual también sois salvos, si retenéis la palabra que os prediqué, a no ser que hayáis creído en vano.” (1 Corintios 15:2). La soteriología del libro de Hebreos, por tanto, no parece ser diferente de la de Pablo y Pedro. Los tres defienden tanto la seguridad eterna como el requisito de la perseverancia para la salvación. Ambos mantienen unidas estas dos doctrinas al sostener que la prueba de un verdadero creyente es que perseverará en la fe. En numerosos textos, Pablo indica que ciertos comportamientos, incluida la perseverancia, acompañan necesariamente a la verdadera salvación y advierte a los creyentes que se pongan a prueba a sí mismos para asegurarse de que están realmente en la fe (por ejemplo, 2 Corintios 13:5-6).

El propósito de los pasajes de advertencia

Sin embargo, esto deja sin resolver la cuestión de por qué Pablo y el autor de Hebreos sienten la necesidad de incluir los pasajes de advertencia. Si los verdaderos creyentes no dejarán de perseverar, ¿qué sentido tiene advertirles que deben perseverar en la fe para heredar la salvación? La respuesta que encuentro más satisfactoria es la que Thomas Schreiner ha llamado “el punto de vista de los medios de salvación”.[xix]  Es decir, observar y hacer caso de los pasajes de advertencia es el medio por el que obtenemos la salvación. No se trata de una salvación basada en las obras, ya que, en mi opinión, la perseverancia es una expresión necesaria de la verdadera fe y está anclada en la gracia sustentadora de Dios. Aunque las obras son necesarias para la salvación, esas obras no son meritorias. Más bien, las obras son un acompañamiento necesario de la fe salvadora. La gracia de Dios es tan poderosa que no sólo imparte al creyente la salvación sin ninguna obra meritoria de nuestra parte, sino que también regenera al creyente. En efecto, “lo sorprendente de las Escrituras es que los pasajes relativos a la firmeza de la fidelidad de Dios y los pasajes con amonestaciones son inseparables. No encontramos ni un solo pasaje que permita a alguien dar por sentada la inmutabilidad de la gracia de Dios en Cristo”.[xx]

Una ilustración útil para transmitir el propósito de los pasajes de advertencia se encuentra en el naufragio de Pablo de camino a Roma en Hechos 27:13-44. Pablo dice a los marineros, “Pero ahora os exhorto a tener buen ánimo, porque no habrá pérdida de vida entre vosotros, sino solo del barco,” (Versículo 22), ya que un ángel le había dicho a Pablo que “Dios te ha concedido todos los que navegan contigo” (Versículo 23). No obstante, “Pablo dijo al centurión y a los soldados: Si estos no permanecen en la nave, vosotros no podréis salvaros.” (Versículo 31). Aquí, Pablo tiene la garantía de Dios de que todos los que están con él en el barco se salvarán. Sin embargo, Pablo también advierte con franqueza a los marineros que para salvarse deben permanecer en el barco. En otras palabras, su salvación estaba condicionada a su permanencia allí, pero Dios cumplió la condición llevándolos a que perseveraran. Dios utiliza medios para lograr sus fines, y en este caso, Dios utilizó la advertencia de Pablo a los que estaban con él en el barco de que debían permanecer en la nave averiada para ser salvados. Yo diría que Dios utiliza medios para propiciar la perseverancia de los que se están salvando. Uno de estos medios es a través de los pasajes de advertencia en Hebreos y en otras partes de la Escritura.

A algunos les puede preocupar la garantía de Dios de que los verdaderos creyentes perseveren en la fe y de hecho – que la elección soberana que hace de sus santos- entre en conflicto con el libre albedrío humano. Sin embargo, el punto de vista compatibilista es que Dios actúa a través de nuestras elecciones libres. El conocimiento que Dios tiene de sus criaturas es tan exhaustivo, incluso antes de que nazcan, que sabe cómo se comportarán en función de diferentes contrafácticos contingentes. Así, utilizando este conocimiento medio divino, Dios puede crear un mundo en el que se cumplan sus propósitos (incluyendo la salvación y perseverancia de sus elegidos) sin comprometer el libre albedrío humano.[xxi]

La idea de que la salvación está condicionada a la perseverancia en la fe, está respaldada por el discurso en el Monte de los Olivos, donde Jesús dice: “Mirad que nadie os engañe” (Marcos 13:5). Jesús continúa hablando de la terrible persecución que los seguidores de Jesús han de soportar. Dice que “Y seréis odiados de todos por causa de mi nombre, pero el que persevere hasta el fin, ese será salvo” (Marcos 13:13). Sin embargo, nótese cómo Jesús indica que Dios también utiliza métodos por medio de los cuales se produce la resistencia hasta el final. Continúa diciendo “Porque aquellos días serán de tribulación, tal como no ha acontecido desde el principio de la creación que hizo Dios hasta ahora, ni acontecerá jamás. Y si el Señor no hubiera acortado aquellos días, nadie se salvaría; pero por causa de los escogidos que Él eligió, acortó los días.” (Marcos 13:19-20). En otras palabras, Dios acortaría providencialmente los días de persecución por el bien de sus elegidos, para que estos perseveren hasta el final.

Conclusión

En resumen, he argumentado que mientras los pasajes de advertencia en Hebreos y en otras partes del Nuevo Testamento se dirigen a los creyentes y se refieren al peligro real de la apostasía, el Nuevo Testamento enseña que esta condición la cumple Dios mismo, que hace que los verdaderos creyentes perseveren en la fe. Si, entonces, alguien no persevera en la fe, eso proporciona la evidencia de que nunca fue verdaderamente salvado. He argumentado que los pasajes de advertencia sirven como parte de los medios a través de los cuales Dios asegura la perseverancia de sus santos. Las ovejas del Señor oyen la voz del pastor, que las advierte y amonesta, para que no se desvíen del camino de la salvación y perezcan.

Notas de pie de página:

[i] David Alan Black, “Who Wrote Hebrews? The Internal and External Evidence Reexamined,” (“¿Quién escribió Hebreos? La evidencia interna y externa reexaminada”) Faith & Mission 18, no. 2 (Spring 2001): 3-26.

[ii] Thomas R. Schreiner, “Perseverance and Assurance: A Survey and a Proposal,” (Perseverancia y seguridad: Un estudio y una propuesta) The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 2, no. 1 (Spring 1998): 32-62.

[iii] Buist M. Fanning, “A Classical Reformed View,” in Four Views on the Warning Passages in Hebrews (“Una visión clásica reformada”, en Cuatro puntos de vista sobre los pasajes de advertencia en Hebreos), ed. H. W. Bateman IV (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Academic & Professional, 2007), 207.

[iv] James R. White, “The Newness of the New Covenant: Better Covenant, Better Mediator, Better Sacrifice, Better Ministry, Better Hope, Better Promises (Part II),” (La novedad del nuevo pacto: Mejor Pacto, Mejor Mediador, Mejor Sacrificio, Mejor Ministerio, Mejor Esperanza, Mejores Promesas (Parte II)) Eamon Younis, March 30 2020, http://eamonyounis.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-newness-of-new-covenant-better_30.html.

[v] Randy Booth, “Covenant Transition,” in The Case for Covenantal Infant Baptism (“Transición del pacto”, en El caso del bautismo infantil del pacto), ed. Gregg Strawbridge (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2003), 298.

[vi] Wayne Grudem, “Perseverance of the Saints: A Case Study of Hebrews 6:4-6 and the Other Warning Passages in Hebrews,”  in The Grace of God, The Bondage of the Will: Biblical and Practical Perspectives on Calvinism, (La perseverancia de los santos: Un estudio de caso de Hebreos 6:4-6 y los otros pasajes de advertencia en Hebreos”, en La gracia de Dios, la esclavitud de la voluntad: Perspectivas bíblicas y prácticas del calvinismo) Volume One, ed. Thomas R. Schreiner and Bruce A. Ware (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1995), 177-178.

[vii] Thomas R. Schreiner, “Perseverance and Assurance: A Survey and a Proposal,” (Perseverancia y seguridad: Un estudio y una propuesta) The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 2, no. 1 (Spring 1998), 49-50.

[viii] Ibid., 50.

[ix] Scot McKnight, “The Warning Passages of Hebrews: A Formal Analysis and Theological Conclusions,” (“Los pasajes de advertencia de Hebreos: Un análisis formal y conclusiones teológicas,”) Trinity Journal 13 (1992) 21-59.

[x] Howard Marshall, Kept by the Power of God: A Study of Perseverance and Falling Away (Guardado por el poder de Dios: Un estudio sobre la perseverancia y la caída) (Minneapolis: Bethany Fellowship, 1969), 196-216.

[xi] Ibid., 210-211.

[xii] Ibid., 103.

[xiii] Charles Stanley, Eternal Security: Can You Be Sure? (La seguridad eterna: ¿Puede estar seguro?) (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1990).

[xiv] R.T. Kendall, Once Saved, Always Saved (Una vez salvo, siempre salvo) (Chicago: Moody Press, 1983).

[xv] Zane C. Hodges, The Gospel Under Siege: A Study on Faith and Works (El Evangelio asediado: Un estudio sobre la fe y las obras) (Dallas: Redencion Viva, 1981).

[xvi] Zane C. Hodges, Absolutely Free: A Biblical Reply to Lordship Salvation (Absolutamente libre: Una respuesta bíblica a la salvación por el señorío) (Dallas: Redención Viva, 1989 and Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1989).

[xvii] R.T. Kendall, Once Saved, Always Saved (Una vez salvo, siempre salvo) (Chicago: Moody Press, 1983), 125-130, 159-184.

[xviii] Ibid., 177-178.

[xix] Thomas R. Schreiner, “Perseverance and Assurance: A Survey and a Proposal,” (Perseverancia y seguridad: Un estudio y una propuesta) The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 2, no. 1 (Spring 1998), 32-62.

[xx] Gerrit Cornelis Berkouwer, Faith and Perseverance, (Fe y perseverancia) trans. R. D. Knudsen (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1958), 116-117.

[xxi] Kenneth Keathley, Salvation and Sovereinty: A Molistinist Approach (Salvación y soberanía: Un enfoque molinista)(Nashville, TN: B&H Academic, 2010).

Recursos recomendados en Español:

Robándole a Dios (tapa blanda), (Guía de estudio para el profesor) y (Guía de estudio del estudiante) por el Dr. Frank Turek

Por qué no tengo suficiente fe para ser un ateo (serie de DVD completa), (Manual de trabajo del profesor) y (Manual del estudiante) del Dr. Frank Turek

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

El Dr. Jonathan McLatchie es un escritor cristiano, orador internacional y debatiente. Tiene una licenciatura (con honores) en biología forense, un máster (M.Res) en biología evolutiva, un segundo máster en biociencia médica y molecular, y un doctorado en biología evolutiva. En la actualidad, es profesor adjunto de biología en el Sattler College de Boston (Massachusetts). El Dr. McLatchie colabora en varios sitios web de apologética y es el fundador de la Apologetics Academy [Academia de Apologética] (Apologetics-Academy.org), un ministerio que trata de equipar y formar a los cristianos para que defiendan la fe de forma persuasiva mediante seminarios web regulares, así como de ayudar a los cristianos que se enfrentan a las dudas. El Dr. McLatchie ha participado en más de treinta debates moderados en todo el mundo con representantes del ateísmo, el islam y otras perspectivas alternativas de cosmovisión. Ha dado charlas internacionales en Europa, Norteamérica y Sudáfrica promoviendo una fe cristiana inteligente, reflexiva y basada en la evidencia

Fuente Original del blog: https://bit.ly/3bo21og

Traducido por Monica Pirateque

Editado por Elenita Romero 

 

By Natasha Crain

In case you haven’t seen it yet, there’s a $100 million advertising campaign that launched this year across the United States and is aimed at helping rescue Jesus’s reputation from the “damage” done by His followers. It features a website, billboards in major cities, and ads that have been viewed 300 million times. “He Gets Us[i],” as the campaign is known, is funded by anonymous donors. If you haven’t seen the ads yet, you likely will soon.

Many Christians immediately have a problem with the idea that Jesus would in some way be “marketed.” As a former marketing executive and adjunct market research professor, I don’t necessarily think such a marketing campaign is inherently problematic. Marketing is simply the discipline of effectively getting a given message to a given audience. If your church has a website, you’re “marketing.” If you have a board in front of your church that announces the weekly sermon subject, you’re “marketing.” If you pass out tracts about Jesus, you’re “marketing.”

In other words, if donors are paying to tell the world about Jesus on a grand scale so that more people may come to a saving knowledge of Him, praise God.

But the message shared better be an accurate message about Jesus, lest you’re actually leading people away from Him in some way.

And therein lies the problem with He Gets Us. The Jesus of this campaign is nothing more than an inspiring human who relates to our problems and cares a whole lot about a culturally palatable version of social justice.

Since many people will be discussing the campaign in coming months, I want to highlight seven significant problems to watch out for and to share with friends who may be misled by what they see.

1. The fact that Jesus “gets us,” stripped from the context of His identity, is meaningless.

The name of the campaign alone should raise at least a preliminary red flag for Christians. Generally speaking, when people or churches focus on the humanity of Jesus—an emphasis on the idea that “He was just like us!”—it’s to the exclusion of His divinity. But Jesus matters not primarily because He understands what it’s like to be human, but because of who He is. In other words, it’s only His identity as God Himself that makes the fact that He “gets us” even relevant.

Why?

If Jesus wasn’t God, it doesn’t matter that He understands what it’s like to be human. Literally every other human has experienced humanity as well! Who cares that this Jesus fellow “gets” humanity like everyone else? But if Jesus was God, the incarnation becomes an amazing truth, because the God of the universe also experienced the nature of humanity.

Of course, if the campaign simply had a title which lacked clarity but its execution was something very different, there wouldn’t be a problem. Unfortunately, that’s not the case. Read on.

2. Jesus is presented as an example, not a Savior.

There’s nothing I’ve seen or read in the campaign that presents Jesus as God Himself or a Savior for humanity. The questions asked and answered on the site include things like: Was Jesus ever lonely? Was Jesus ever stressed? Did Jesus have fun? Did Jesus face criticism?

But again, if Jesus was nothing more than a human, why are we even asking these questions? We could just as well be asking, Was George Washington ever lonely? Was George Washington ever stressed? Did George Washington have fun? Did George Washington face criticism?

The campaign wants you to care about Jesus because He’s a great moral example. They say, for instance, “No matter what we think of Christianity, most people can agree on one thing. During his lifetime, Jesus set a pretty good example of peace and love.”

But if that’s all Jesus is—a good example—don’t spend millions on a campaign to tell people about Him. We can find good human examples all over the place. Jesus is a good example—the ultimate example—but most importantly, He’s the Son of God. That’s why His example matters.

3. The campaign reinforces the problematic idea that Jesus’s followers have Jesus all wrong.

Jon Lee, one of the chief architects of the campaign, says the team wanted to start a movement of people who want to tell a better story about Jesus[ii] and act like him. Lee states, “Our goal is to give voice to the pent-up energy of like-minded Jesus followers, those who are in the pews and the ones that aren’t, who are ready to reclaim the name of Jesus from those who abuse it to judge, harm and divide people.”

For 2,000 years, people have done terrible things in the name of Christ—things that Jesus Himself would never have approved of. There’s no question in that sense that people have “abused” the name of Jesus for their own evil purposes.

But in today’s culture, there’s a popular notion that Jesus was the embodiment of love and all things warm and fuzzy, whereas His followers who talk about judgment, sin, objective morality, the authority of Scripture, and so on, are hopelessly at odds with what He taught. The He Gets Us campaign plays straight into that misconceived dichotomy.

Christians who adhere to clear biblical teachings on hot topics like the sanctity of life, gender identity, and sexuality, for example, are consistently accused of “harming” others by even holding those beliefs. Those who speak the truth about what God has already judged to be right and wrong are accused of being “judgmental” themselves. Those who understand Jesus to be the Son of God—the embodiment of truth, not warm fuzzies—are accused of being divisive when rightly seeking to divide truth from error as the Bible teaches (1 John 4:6).

So the question is, when Lee says that he wants to rescue the name of Jesus from those who “abuse it to judge, harm and divide people,” does he mean that he wants to give people a more biblical understanding of Jesus, or does he want to rescue an unbiblical, culturally palatable version of Jesus from followers who proclaim truth that people don’t want to hear?

I think the answer is clear from my next point.

4. The campaign reinforces what culture wants to believe about Jesus while leaving out what culture doesn’t want to believe.

Whereas the campaign is seeking to give people a fresh picture of Jesus, all it really does is reinforce the feel-good image culture already has. A representative web page[iii], for example, talks about how Jesus “invited everyone to sit at his table.” The text talks about how “inclusive” Jesus was, how the “religious do-gooders began to whisper behind his back,” and how “the name of Jesus has been used to harm and divide, but if you look at how he lived, you see how backward that really is. Jesus was not exclusive. He was radically inclusive.”

Of course Jesus welcomed everyone around His table. And surely people need to hear that. But He welcomed everyone because everyone needs to hear His message about people’s need for repentance and salvation! Meanwhile, He Gets Us presents Jesus’s actions as though they merely represented an example of how to get along well with others: “Strangers eating together and becoming friends. What a simple concept, and yet, we’re pretty sure it would turn our own modern world upside down the same way Jesus turned his around 2,000 years ago.”

Of course, if you’re nothing more than a human (see point 1), there’s not much more to take from Jesus’s actions than a social example of playing well with others.

5. The campaign characterizes the so-called culture war in terms of secular social justice rather than underlying worldview differences.

On a page titled, “Jesus was fed up with politics, too,” it says, “Jesus lived in the middle of a culture war…And though the political systems were different (not exactly a representative democracy), the greed, hypocrisy, and oppression different groups used to get their way were very similar.” The page, like many others on the site, has hashtags “#Activist#Justice#RealLife.”

For those familiar with Critical Theory and how it roots secular social justice ideas, this a pretty clear statement of the mindset from which He Gets Us is coming.

If you’re not familiar with how secular social justice ideas and manifestations differ from those of biblical justice, please see chapter 10 in my book, Faithfully Different: Regaining Biblical Clarity in a Secular Culture;[iv] I don’t have the space here to fully reiterate how opposed they are. But the bottom line is that secular social justice is rooted in the idea that the world should be viewed through the lens of placing people in “oppressor” and “oppressed” groups based on social power dynamics. The problems we have in society, according to this view, are that societal structures have produced norms that oppress certain groups, and those groups must be liberated. For example, in such a framework, those who feel oppressed by the gender binary need to be freed from society’s norms of “male and female.” Women whose access to abortion is limited need to be freed from constraints on “reproductive justice.”

The fact that He Gets Us believes culture wars are about the “oppression” different groups use to get their way presupposes a (secular) Critical Theory understanding of the world. In reality, it’s the opposing worldviews in culture that lead to such fundamental disagreement. As I explain throughout Faithfully Different, cultural “wars” over things like the sanctity of life and sexuality are ultimately rooted in disagreements between those who believe in the moral authority of the individual (the secular view) and those who believe in the moral authority of God and His Word (the biblical view).

6. The campaign’s stated goal is about inspiration, not a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ.

The president of the marketing agency behind He Gets Us has explicitly said[v], “Ultimately, the goal is inspiration, not recruitment or conversion.”

Now, as someone with a professional marketing background myself, I very much understand the fact that not every campaign has the goal of getting someone to “purchase” (or, in this case, “convert”). Marketers know that people generally go through preliminary phases of awareness, then interest, and then desire before committing to action. So if this campaign were only working at generating more and deeper awareness of or interest in a biblically faithful Jesus, that would be no problem. But if your goal is inspiration, you’re going to generate an awareness of and interest in a Jesus completely detached from the one a person should be giving their life to.

If it’s not immediately clear why, you can see the outcome of such a problematic goal on the page that asks, “Is this a campaign to get me to go to church?” Their answer is, “No. He Gets Us simply invites all to consider the story of a man who created a radical love movement that continues to impact the world thousands of years later. Many churches focus on Jesus’ experiences, but you don’t have to go to church or even believe in Christianity to find value in them. Whether you consider yourself a Christian, a believer in another faith, a spiritual explorer, or not religious or spiritual in any way, we invite you to hear about Jesus and be inspired by his example.”

Jesus is God of the universe and the exclusive path to salvation (John 14:6). He’s not just a nice guy relevant for “inspiring” people regardless of whatever errant worldview they happen to hold.

Some people reading this may try to be charitable in suggesting that if the campaign were more explicitly about Jesus’s divinity and the need for salvation up front, not as many would get interested in learning more. In other words, maybe the campaign funnels people to places that can deepen and clarify their understanding of Jesus. If that were the case, it would be a horrible, misleading approach. Every marketer knows that the goal is to generate accurate awareness. He Gets Us presents not just an incomplete Jesus, but the wrong one.

Even so, let’s look at where the campaign eventually takes people.

7. The next steps offered by He Gets Us could lead someone far away from truth rather than toward it.

When people become interested in learning more about Jesus, they’re directed to a “Connect” page.

Hundreds of churches have signed up to respond to people who fill out that connect form. Clearly, an important question is where those people are directed. However, there is no theological criteria or statement of faith that churches must adhere to in order to take part. The president of the marketing agency says, [vi]“We hope that all churches that are aligned with the He Gets Us campaign will participate…This includes multiple denominational and nondenominational church affiliations, Catholic and Protestant, churches of various sizes, ethnicities, languages, and geography.”

As I explain in Faithfully Different (and discuss with Dr. George Barna in my recent podcast[vii]), 65% of Americans identify as Christian while only about 6% have a worldview consistent with what the Bible teaches. Dr. Barna’s research has also shown that a dismal percent of pastors have a biblical worldview. If you have no theological criteria for where you’re sending people, you’re actually more likely than not—based on statistics—to be sending them to a church whose teachings don’t line up with those of the Bible.

In other words, you’re sending unsuspecting truth seekers to places where they won’t hear truth.

Yes, Jesus was fully human, but He was also fully God. When you remove half the picture of His identity (as this campaign does), you give people the understanding they want but not the fuller understanding they need. Because of this, He Gets Us has the potential to actually harm the public understanding of Jesus. People need to know that Jesus is our Savior, not a compassionate buddy.

Footnotes

[i] https://hegetsus.com/en

[ii] https://churchleaders.com/news/435958-he-gets-us-campaign-jon-lee-rns.html

[iii] https://hegetsus.com/en/jesus-invited-everyone-to-sit-at-his-table

[iv] https://www.amazon.com/Faithfully-Different-Regaining-Biblical-Clarity/dp/0736984291

[v] https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2022/march/he-gets-us-ad-campaign-branding-jesus-church-marketing.html

[vi] https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2022/march/he-gets-us-ad-campaign-branding-jesus-church-marketing.html

[vii] https://natashacrain.com/what-is-a-biblical-worldview-with-george-barna/

Recommended resources related to the topic:

Legislating Morality (DVD Set), (PowerPoint download), (PowerPoint CD), (MP3 Set) and (DVD mp4 Download Set

Does Jesus Trump Your Politics by Dr. Frank Turek (mp4 download and DVD)

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Natasha Crain is a blogger, author, and national speaker who is passionate about equipping Christian parents to raise their kids with an understanding of how to make a case for and defend their faith in an increasingly secular world. She is the author of two apologetics books for parents: Talking with Your Kids about God (2017) and Keeping Your Kids on God’s Side (2016). Natasha has an MBA in marketing and statistics from UCLA and a certificate in Christian apologetics from Biola University. A former marketing executive and adjunct professor, she lives in Southern California with her husband and three children.

Original Blog Source: https://bit.ly/3EeLC16 

Like all informed citizens, Christians should be involved in politics at some level. But how is that possible? What about the separation of church and state? What about evangelism? Won’t we turn people off to Jesus if we get political? And what is Christian nationalism? Is it a big movement and a real threat?

In this midweek podcast episode, Frank continues the conversation from last week and responds to seven of the most common objections and mistakes we make about Christians and politics. Feel free to jump right in or listen as a follow-up to the previous episode. Either way, you will be educated, enlightened, and edified!

If you would like to submit a question to be answered on the show, please email your question to Hello@Crossexamined.org.

Subscribe on Apple Podcast: http://bit.ly/CrossExamined_Podcast Rate and review! Thanks!!!
Subscribe on Google Play: https://cutt.ly/0E2eua9
Subscribe on Spotify: http://bit.ly/CrossExaminedOfficial_Podcast
Subscribe on Stitcher: http://bit.ly/CE_Podcast_Stitcher

 

By Melissa Dougherty​

Some churches and people make Jesus a mascot.

I’m sure a few people reading this might be scratching their heads, wondering what I mean by this. Others know exactly what I mean. Here in America, sometimes I think we take for granted that we don’t have to “hurt” to follow Jesus. What I mean by that is that we avoid any sort of struggle to obtain most of our Christian virtues.

In other words, we’re too comfortable.

We own a Bible and go to church and don’t get tortured for it. We praise God in our cars, listening to worship music with the windows down without fear of being imprisoned. Yes, I think we take this for granted. We make Jesus a symbol of our good decisions and a “good luck” charm. I remember a long time ago having lunch with a friend. She said that she had to make sure she went to church that week because she knew she was going to need to do good on an upcoming test. She reasoned that if she wore her cross, went to church and read a few Bible passages, then God would grant her grace. Like a give-and-take. 

From time to time, we need perspective on this.

The definition of a mascot is “a person or thing that is supposed to bring good luck or that is used to symbolize a particular event or organization.” I submit that many people make Jesus out to be their mascot, not their God.

Once a week, it’s almost as if Jesus is brought out as a cheerleader to give advice on life’s struggles. Perhaps there’s a sermon about how to manage stress or how to deal with a particular sin. Some will depict Jesus as telling everyone how great they are, that He wants them prosperous and victorious. His main goal? Is to rebuild their confidence. He’ll fix all their problems. Just follow Me, and life will be great! People will then allow Mascot Jesus to reinforce in them what they think God should have us feel like: good and comfortable. He’s a motivational speaker. He tells people everything is just fine, and people are proud to be Christians and followers of this always happy, all-loving, all-tolerant, ‘Cheerleader’ Jesus.

Mascot Jesus is all about cheering us up as if life were like a football game.

But really, He’s put on the sidelines. It’s really about us. He’s just there in case we need Him. Then we get to call the shots and say it’s “God’s will” because this is the form of God that we’ve been taught. Even if there are some who claim to carry His Name, and call themselves Christian, they actually have very little reliance on him as Lord and God. Even then, I wonder if they know what it means to pick up their cross and follow Jesus as He says in the Gospels:

Matthew 16: 24-26: Then Jesus told his disciples, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what shall a man give in return for his soul?

He’s saying to “count the cost” of following Him, which means it will cost you something to follow Him. This doesn’t mean we live lives that are not happy and comfortable like some extremists. This means we know what we’re signing up for when we become a disciple of Jesus and understand the assignment.

For some, there’s not much evidence that they would have that kind of faith in the way they live. Then there are the Christians who say they do love Jesus, and do live for Him…

As long as He’s doing what they want.

As long as “Mascot Jesus” tells them about the “Goliaths” in their life and how to be the “David” overcoming them, they’re on board. Mascot Jesus makes the Bible about you. Mascot Jesus just wants you to be happy. Submission to this Jesus isn’t even hard. It just means following your feelings and making sure you only read the bits and pieces of Scripture that fit your mosaic of who you want Jesus to be. It seems like a contradiction, but many have redefined Jesus as someone they can both admire and ignore at the same time.

He’s Mascot Jesus. He’s convenient. He’s your cheerleader. He’ll make you feel good.

Praiseworthy? Sure! As long as He is in line with what we’re comfortable with and can be used when it’s convenient. As long as He’s a “Jesus” that’s culturally acceptable. Is He the God of your life, or are you? Do you follow the Jesus of the Holy Bible? Or do you follow Jesus that you’ve made in your own image?

Is Jesus your mascot? Or is He your Sovereign Savior?

Count the cost.

Recommended resources related to the topic:

Letters to a Young Progressive by Mike Adams (Book)

Another Gospel? by Alisa Childers (book)

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Melissa Dougherty is a Christian Apologist best known for her YouTube channel as an ex-new ager. She has two associate’s degrees, one in Early Childhood Multicultural Education, and the other in Liberal Arts. She is currently pursuing her bachelor’s degree in Religious Studies at Southern Evangelical Seminary.

 

Another election is upon us! Should Christians get involved, or should we just stay out of it? Is the church getting too political? Have we come to a place where only atheists are allowed to make laws?

In this episode, Frank does a deep dive into four reasons why Christians need to be involved in politics. He explains why it goes against the greatest commandment to “love thy neighbor” if we choose to stay silent on many of these issues! Some of the issues Frank brings to light include the fact that Jesus was involved in politics; that we are commanded to be involved; that Christians can’t ignore the issues of life, so-called “gender-affirming care,” and the fact that our religious freedom— our very ability to preach and live the gospel— is slowly but surely being taken away in the name of other ideologies. At the very least, Christians should VOTE for candidates who will legislate biblical/natural law values (Yes, all laws legislate morality— the only question is, Whose morality?).

To view the entire VIDEO PODCAST, be sure to join our CrossExamined private community. It’s the perfect place to jump into some great discussions with like-minded Christians (including Frank) while simultaneously providing financial support for our ministry.

Here is Rod Dreher’s article referenced in the podcast about our government pushing “gender-affirming care” on children: https://bit.ly/3NxzOtX

If you would like to submit a question to be answered on the show, please email your question to Hello@Crossexamined.org.

Subscribe on Apple Podcast: http://bit.ly/CrossExamined_Podcast Rate and review! Thanks!!!
Subscribe on Google Play: https://cutt.ly/0E2eua9
Subscribe on Spotify: http://bit.ly/CrossExaminedOfficial_Podcast
Subscribe on Stitcher: http://bit.ly/CE_Podcast_Stitcher

 

 

Download Transcript