At his Wonderful Life blog, geneticist Robert Saunders has responded to my recent take down of his “critique” of Stephen Meyer’s arguments for intelligent design, offered and defended in Signature in the Cell. Of course, it wouldn’t be an anti-ID article without its share of condescending rhetoric. Saunders claims that I “have absorbed a typical strategy beloved of Intelligent Design creationists: of devising neologisms that don’t correspond to normally used science terminology, and combined this with ignorance of biology.” I have no doubt that Dr. Saunders is informed about his discipline but the arguments he presents here are weak.
About us
CrossExamined.org is a non-profit ministry started in 2006 that conducts dynamic I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be An Atheist seminars on college campuses, churches, and high schools.
subscribe to blog
Total Subscribers: 102,522
Our App
Recent Posts
- Were the Gospel Accounts Reliably Recorded?By Al SerratoOctober 4, 2024
- Ten Philosophical Challenges Christian Students Face at Secular UniversityBy Owen AndersonSeptember 27, 2024
- How The After Party Curriculum Is Sowing Political Confusion in the ChurchBy Natasha CrainSeptember 25, 2024
Popular Posts
- The Top 20 Christian Apologists
Frank Turek with the world's most credentialed and likable apologist, Dr. J...
- A Simple Reason Why The Qur’an Cannot Be The Word of God
The Islamic religion claims that the Qur’an, revealed allegedly by the ange...
- Who Wrote the Gospel of Matthew?
By Brian Chilton Over the course of the new few weeks, we will discuss the...
Facebook Comments