At his Wonderful Life blog, geneticist Robert Saunders has responded to my recent take down of his “critique” of Stephen Meyer’s arguments for intelligent design, offered and defended in Signature in the Cell. Of course, it wouldn’t be an anti-ID article without its share of condescending rhetoric. Saunders claims that I “have absorbed a typical strategy beloved of Intelligent Design creationists: of devising neologisms that don’t correspond to normally used science terminology, and combined this with ignorance of biology.” I have no doubt that Dr. Saunders is informed about his discipline but the arguments he presents here are weak.
About us
CrossExamined.org is a non-profit ministry started in 2006 that conducts dynamic I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be An Atheist seminars on college campuses, churches, and high schools.
subscribe to blog
Total Subscribers: 102,522
Our App
Recent Posts
- The Suffering ChristianBy Thomas H. MollerApril 17, 2024
- Show Us A Sign: The Cross And The Death Of Blind FaithBy Shane GeislerApril 15, 2024
- Critical Thinking: The Secret Weapon of Confident ChristiansBy Jason JiminezApril 10, 2024
Popular Posts
- The Mind-Blowing Meaning Behind the Sign of Jonah by Guest | posted on October 13, 2021
- A Simple Reason Why The Qur’an Cannot Be The Word of God by Jonathan McLatchie | posted on April 2, 2014
- The Top 20 Christian Apologists by Frank Turek | posted on May 31, 2014
- The Suffering Christian by Ty Unknown | posted on April 17, 2024
- What Does it Mean to be Unequally Yoked? by Guest | posted on March 15, 2023
Facebook Comments