We have recently been discussing a series of critical reviews of Science and Human Origins published by PhD student Paul McBride on his blog Still Monkeys. I am going to respond now to McBride’s review of chapter 4, in which he tackles Casey Luskin’s handling of the subject of “junk DNA.” McBride’s rebuttal to chapter 4 is divided into two sections — part 1 and part 2. First, McBride (before having read the chapter) makes ten predictions about what he will find. He then offers a response to the chapter itself.
About us
CrossExamined.org is a non-profit ministry started in 2006 that conducts dynamic I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be An Atheist seminars on college campuses, churches, and high schools.
subscribe to blog
Total Subscribers: 81,725
Our App
Recent Posts
So You Left the New Age… Now What? Five Helpful Tips
By GuestMay 18, 2022When Hollywood gets God and virtue right
By Frank TurekMay 17, 2022How We Got Our Bible: Manuscript Tradition
By GuestMay 16, 2022
Popular Posts
-
How We Got Our Bible: Manuscript Tradition by Guest | posted on May 16, 2022
-
5 Signs Your Church Might be Heading Toward Progressive Christianity by Guest | posted on January 9, 2021
-
The Top 20 Christian Apologists by Frank Turek | posted on May 31, 2014
-
When Hollywood gets God and virtue right by Frank Turek | posted on May 17, 2022
-
Who Wrote the Gospel of Matthew? by Guest | posted on June 11, 2017
Facebook Comments