Scripture reports that there were guards at the tomb of Jesus (Matt. 27:62-66). This historical claim has been either much discussed by some apologists, but largely dismissed or ignored by others despite its potential significance in resurrection narrative.
Dismissing the Guard Evidence
For example, here is William Lane Craig answering a question about the guards at the tomb:
Craig doesn’t think much of this “guard” claim.
Defending the Guard Evidence
On the other hand, Dr. Timothy McGrew, professor of philosophy at Western Michigan University, has a thorough response to the challenge of Matthew’s veracity concerning the resurrection as it pertains to the guards narrative in Matthew 27:62-66. It is well worth the read as Dr. McGrew picks apart the claims of resurrection-critic V.J. Torley. He aims his critique here at the historicity of the guards narrative. Torley claims that the narrative is unhistorical for several reasons:
- It is mentioned only in Matthew’s Gospel, not in the other three.
- This account fails to explain why the body could not have been stolen on Friday night.
- We are not told why Pilate would agree to the Jewish leaders’ request.
- The Jewish rulers would not have made such a request of Pilate, since a gentile employed by a Jew would not be allowed to work on the Sabbath.
McGrew systematically dismantles each of these reasons. A quick summary of each rebuttal:
- Rebuttal: This is an argument from silence; why can’t a single source be adequate for historicity. As McGrew points out: “Many of the events of antiquity crop up in only one source.”
- Rebuttal: This reason is assuming that the request is made on Saturday morning. Again McGrew points out: “it is not even clear from the text that the request was made on Saturday”
- Rebuttal: Just because we are not told why something happens, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. McGrew: “this is a very odd way to object to historical evidence. Many narratives recount events without affording us an explanation for them, and sometimes we are left to guess what that explanation might be. So what?”
- Rebuttal: “Nothing in Jewish law as interpreted at the time would prevent them from making such a request.”
In these charges against the “guards” theory, McGrew lays out a clear rebuttal showing that the historicity of this claim is still credible. In later posts, responding to V.J. Torley, he develops the case even further (here and here). Definitely worth keeping up with.
Recommended Resources:
Why We Know the New Testament Writers Told the Truth by Frank Turek (mp4 Download)
The Top Ten Reasons We Know the NT Writers Told the Truth mp3 by Frank Turek
Early Evidence for the Resurrection by Dr. Gary Habermas (DVD), (Mp3) and (Mp4)
I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist (Paperback), and (Sermon) by Norman Geisler and Frank Turek
J. Steve Lee has taught Apologetics for over two and a half decades at Prestonwood Christian Academy. He also has taught World Religions and Philosophy at Mountain View College in Dallas and Collin College in Plano. With a degree in history and education from the University of North Texas, Steve continued his formal studies at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary with a M.A. in philosophy of religion and has pursued doctoral studies at the University of Texas at Dallas and is finishing his dissertation at South African Theological Seminary. He has published several articles for the Apologetics Study Bible for Students as well as articles and book reviews in various periodicals including Philosophia Christi, Hope’s Reason: A Journal of Apologetics, and the Areopagus Journal. Having an abiding love for fantasy fiction, Steve has contributed chapters to two books on literary criticism of Harry Potter: Harry Potter for Nerds and Teaching with Harry Potter. He even appeared as a guest on the podcast MuggleNet Academia (“Lesson 23: There and Back Again-Chiasmus, Alchemy, and Ring Composition in Harry Potter”). He is married to his lovely wife, Angela, and has two grown boys, Ethan and Josh.
Originally posted at: https://bit.ly/4c9AstW
Facebook Comments