Being A Good Apologist Is More Than Knowing The Right Answers
1 Peter 3:15 says to âAlways be ready to give a defense to anyone who asks you to give a reason for the hope that you have, yet do so with gentleness and respectâ and 2 Corinthians 10:5 says âWe demolish argument and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take every thought captive to make it obedient to Christ.â These two verses are the primary verses that make Christian Apologetics a precedent for the follower of Christ. We are to give the unbelievers reasons to believe Christianity is true and we are to demolish every argument that tries to show it isnât. However, being a good apologist is more than just knowing the right answers to peoplesâ objections and questions, and knowing how to make a case for Christianity. To be a good apologist, you must know more than âIf this person says X, then Iâll respond with Yâ. Giving a defense to anyone who asks is not like giving the answer to a mathematical equation.
Being a good apologist means being a good communicator, and that involves utilizing certain skills. Not everyone has these skills, but thankfully, if you know what skills you need, you can train yourself in these areas. Now, what are these skills you need?
The Accordion Tactic
You can learn the evidence for The Minimal Facts Case For Jesusâ Resurrection, or the evidence behind the premises of The Kalam Cosmological Argument, and you may even be able to do a good talk on this at your church. But can you relay these arguments in 5 minutes or less? In evangelism encounters, sometimes thatâs all the time we have to talk with this person. Or even we do have more time to talk to them, not everyone wants to listen to your monologue for 45 minutes. If you want it to be a dialogue, you need to be able to compress your presentation of the arguments for Godâs existence and the resurrection to 5 minutes or less. This skill comes in handy not just in one on one evangelism, but even in internet conversations. With some people, if a comment becomes way too lengthy, theyâll lose interest and comment âTL;DRâ which means âToo long, didnât readâ.
This isnât easy. Iâve struggled with brevity my entire apologetics career, but this is a practice that I keep practicing and practicing on. I do believe Iâm getting better. With regards to my 6 favorite arguments, I can expand them like an accordion to do a 45-minute talk, or I can compress them to explain an argument to a friend in the time it takes to listen to a song. Compare my treatment of The Kalam Cosmological Argument, Fine-Tuning Argument, Local Fine-Tuning Argument, etc. in my book Inference To The One True God: Why I Believe In Jesus Instead Of Other Gods with my treatment of them in part 6 and part 7of my blog series on the problem of evil. The former is when my apologetic accordion is expanded. The latter is when my apologetic accordion is contracted. Learn this skill of playing the apologetic accordion and youâll be able to defend the faith no matter how much or how little time youâre allotted. Oh, and, having a monkey wearing a fez isnât required. Donât worry about that.
Learn To Listen
At the National Conference On Christian Apologetics, Dr. Ray Civero gave a talk called âTurning Skeptics Into Seekersâ. In this talk, one of his points is that we need to listen to what the other person is saying, and we need to listen not merely to respond to the argument, but to understand the argument. Listen to understand, donât listen to respond. If youâre not paying attention to what the non-Christian is saying regarding his objections to Christianity, you will most likely (1) Attack a straw man in your response, (2) give the unbeliever the impression that you donât care what he has to say, (3) Give the unbeliever that you just like to listen to yourself talk, and (4) turn him off to anything you have to say. (5) You will be like two ships passing in the night. In other words, youâll be talking past each other.
Be like Ray Civeroâs character Ike The Investigator. Ike doesnât listen to anticipate. Ike listens to understand. Ike doesnât listen to his opponentâs position trying to find some way to tear it apart. Ike listens to understand where the other person is coming from, to understand what the other person is actually saying.
Jesus said, âDo unto others as you would have them do unto youâ (Luke 6:31). I canât tell you how often Iâve been frustrated with a non-Christian when Iâve explained something over and over, as clearly and concisely as I possibly could, mustering all of my effort to get them to understand what it was that I was actually saying, just to have them attack a straw man for the umpteenth time in their response to me. For example, there have been conversations where I bent over backwards trying to get the non-Christian to realize that The Minimal Facts Case For Jesusâ Resurrection isnât question-begging, it doesnât âcite The Bible to prove The Bibleâ, but instead treats The New Testament documents like a historian would treat any document claiming to be telling history (e.g A letter written by George Washington, a biography of Abraham Lincoln, Josephusâ writings). Christian and Non-Christian historians alike arrive at the minimal facts by applying the standard historical methodology to the text (e.g the principle of multiple attestation, the principle of embarrassment). It isnât a circular argument.
Yet, no matter how I strain to get the other person to see the point, they still just donât get it. If he wants to disagree with my arguments, thatâs fine. If he wants to say he doesnât think the resurrection is the best inference to the minimal facts, thatâs fine. I donât loathe debate, I loathe having to repeat myself and draw a hundred maps with the result of the other person still not understanding the argument. Why donât they understand the argument? I can only guess that theyâre simply skimming my comments. Theyâre too eager to respond to my comment so they donât stop and actually try to understand what it is that Iâm actually saying.
I think weâve all been guilty of this at least a few times, Christian and non-Christian alike. However, we need to guard against it. James 1:19 says âBe quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to become angry.â If weâre to obey the golden rule and James 1:19, and if weâre to have a fruitful dialogue, then we need to be good listeners.
Have The Patience Of A Saint
There are jobs where having a short fuse is a handicap inherent to the job itself: being a cop, being a lawyer, working in retail, and being a Christian Apologist. Because in all of these, youâre going to come against people who will really try your patience. You need to have a pretty long fuse or else youâll fail the task youâre trying to do.
If youâre going to be a Christian Apologist, you need to have thick skin, because there will be people who ridicule you, demean you, insult you, and slander you. It can be tempting to respond in kind, but The Bible tells us âAlways be ready to give a defense to anyone who asks you to give a reason for the hope that you have, yet do so with gentleness and respectâ (1 Peter 3:15, emphasis mine). I know of some apologists (wonât name names) who obey the first half of this verse, but not the second. They give a defense for the hope they have alright, but they make total donkeys out of themselves while doing it. If you donât give a defense with gentleness and respect, you have failed to fully obey 1 Peter 3:15.
2 Timothy 2:24-26 says âThe Lordâs servant must not quarrel, but be gentle towards all, able to teach, patient, in gentleness correcting those who oppose him: perhaps God may give them repentance leading to a full knowledge of the truth, and they may recover themselves out of the devilâs snare, having been taken captive by him to his will.â
Conclusion
These are a few of the most important skills you need to master to be a good Christian Apologist. Simply having the answers is not enough. That would be like saying you can be a police officer if you have a uniform, a badge, and a gun. While those definitely are necessary conditions to being a cop, they are not sufficient conditions. Likewise, being well read in the apologetic literature is a necessary condition to being an apologist, but not a sufficient condition. You need people skills!
Suggested reading:
âThe Open Minded Christian: How To Deal Charitably With Fellow Sinnersâ â by Richard Bushey
âTactics: A Game Plan For Defending Your Christian Convictionsâ by Greg Koukl
âArguing With Friends: Keeping Your Friends And Your Convictionsâ by Paul Buller
Evan Minton is a Christian Apologist and blogger at Cerebral Faith (www.cerebralfaith.blogspot.com). He is the author of âInference To The One True Godâ and âA Hellacious Doctrineâ. He has engaged in several debates which can be viewed on Cerebral Faithâs âMy Debatesâ section. Mr. Minton lives in South Carolina, USA.
Original Blog Source: http://bit.ly/2AsAA82
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!