Biblical Faith VS. Blind Faith

By Evan Minton

Many Christians when asked by unbelievers why they should believe anything The Bible says, the most common response is “Just have faith!”. And this “just have faith” line is pretty much the answer to every single objection one could possibly raise against the Christian.

Blind Faith

Far too often people are turned away because of intellectual doubts that plague them. “If God is all loving and all powerful, why does He let so much suffering go on in the world?” “How could a loving God send people to an eternal Hell?” “How do I know Yahweh is the one true God instead of these thousands of other gods in these other religions that contradict Christianity? How do I know The Bible is true and not The Koran or the Hindu Scriptures?” And when a Christian or a pastor responds with “Just have faith” that translates in the mind of the unbeliever as “in order to be a Christian, you need to commit intellectual suicide.” This blind faith approach is so, so, so very unbiblical. Many places in The Bible command us to tell others WHY Christianity is true.

“Always be ready to give an answer to anyone who asks you to give a reason for the hope that you have, but do so with gentleness and respect.” – 1 Peter 3:15

“We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.” – 2 Corinthians 10:5

In Jude 1:3, Jude urges his readers to DEFEND the faith (that’s what we call “Christian Apologetics”).

In Phillipians 1:16, Paul says that he was appointed to DEFEND the good news (i.e do Christian Apologetics).

“Live wisely among those who are not believers, and make the most of every opportunity. Let your conversation be gracious and attractive so that you will have the right response for everyone.” – Colossians 4:5-6

In 2 Corinthians 12:12 Paul says he gave the Corinthians PROOF that he was indeed an apostle from God because he performed many signs and wonders when he was with them. If God really wanted us to have blind faith, why would Paul give evidence for his credibility?

In 2 Corinthians 13:3 Paul says he is willing to offer the Corinthians PROOF that Christ speaks through him. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa whoa! Hold the phone, Paul! Paul, buddy! Don’t you know that if you offer the Corinthians proof that Christ speaks through you that they won’t have legitimate faith? Why would you deprive them they opportunity of having faith, Paul? Maybe faith isn’t what people think it is.

Objection: If you need evidence, you don’t have faith.

This is an objection often proposed by Christians (as well as atheists) who think that the word “faith” means to believe something without any reason to and/or even to believe something in the face of reasons to not believe it. This distortion of the meaning of the word “faith” has had very bad consequences on the church because it makes a person think that Christianity requires you to be an undiscerning airhead who doesn’t like reason.

Here is a Bible verse that gives an example of a person placing their faith in God in spite of having evidence for His existence. I tell ya, reading The Bible is like going into a spiritual gold mine and mining all the good stuff you find. BUT you gotta dig for it. Usually, I’m not looking for stuff like this, I just happen to stumble across it while reading through the verses. I found this one night when reading through Exodus. I think it does a good job of arguing against Christians who think that apologetics is wrong because you’re supposed to have blind, undiscerning belief.

“When the Israelites saw the mighty power that The Lord had unleashed against the Egyptians, they were filled with awe before Him. THEY PUT THEIR FAITH IN HIM and His servant Moses.” – Exodus 14:31

Clearly, the Israelites had evidence that God existed and was helping them escape Egypt and yet the text says they put their faith in Him anyway (for a little while at least. we all know they lost faith a bunch of times after this). They ESPECIALLY had evidence that MOSES existed and the text says they placed their faith in him as well. So given this piece of scriptural evidence we know that a Christian can still base his belief THAT Christianity is true on the basis of evidence and still be able to have faith in God. You see, faith means the same thing as the word “trust”. Or as I’ve said before “Faith is when someone is holding you over a ledge and knowing in your heart that not only will they not let you fall, they’ll pull you up to safety”. You know that the person holding onto you exists. You have very powerful evidence that that person exists, yet all the evidence in the world is not going to make you trust that that person will help save your life. This is the real definition of the word “faith”.

I like using an analogy. Let’s say you discovered you had heart disease, and need a risky surgery. You have sufficient resources, so you research doctors, anesthesiologists, etc. until you have the best team possible assembled. You now have a group of people that you believe will give you the best chance of survival. Even though you have researched extensively, you still show your faith in this team when you allow yourself to be put under. Faith does not mean not researching and exploring the truth. Jesus even says as much when he tells us to love God with our heart, soul, *MIND* and strength. <– Here you can look at other translations of Exodus 14:31 to see all the different words that are used other than “faith”. The NLT uses “faith”, the NIV used “trust”, the KJV uses “believed” that is; they believed IN God and His promises even though they had just witnessed good evidence THAT He existed and was helping them. This is the difference between belief THAT God exists, THAT Jesus rose from the dead and belief IN His character and His promises to you.

We are never told to have a blind faith. Paul commended those in Berea for checking the Scriptures daily to see if what he was telling them was so. Jesus showed Himself alive to make sure those believed on Him, especially Thomas (John 20:28)

Paul also said to “Test everything, hold onto the good.” – 1 Thessalonians 5:21

1 Thessalonians 5:21 seems to be telling us to have just the exact opposite of blind faith.

Objection: “Without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly” – Hebrews 11:6

I agree with this. Without faith it is impossible to please God. But then again, it’s impossible to please ANYONE without faith. It is not possible to have a good relationship with any human being without faith. What is faith? Remember, the word “faith” is synonymous with “trust”. If you’re constantly distrusting God, you’re not going to have a very good relationship with Him just as you wouldn’t have a very good relationship with your wife/husband if you were always distrusting her/him. If you’re constantly suspecting your wife of cheating on you, I “suspect” that it’s not going to be very long before she hands you the divorce papers telling you “I can’t live with someone who distrusts me so severely”. Although sometimes that kind of suspicion is warranted.

I walk by faith, not by sight. This doesn’t mean I believe God exists without any evidence or reason. It means I trust in Him even when I don’t know what He’s up to. Sometimes our circumstances can have deceitful appearances. Sometimes it looks like God has abandoned us when He really hasn’t. Sometimes it looks like God won’t keep His promises. Sometimes we think our suffering has no good purpose to it. It is in times like these that we have to have faith in (i.e to place our TRUST in) God. That His plans are for ours or someone else’s ultimate good.

Having evidence for God’s existence does not mean you’re not walking by faith. Faith is placing one’s trust in a person. Just because you have EVIDENCE for that person’s existence does not mean you don’t trust them. Moses had PLENTY of evidence for God’s existence, but He still had to trust that God was going to lead Him and the Jews where He said they were going to. Many times it looked like Yahweh was leading them on a wild goose chase, but Moses continued to have FAITH in the God which he had plenty of proof existed. Although many of the people did lose faith. They got impatient and started worshipping false idols, and constantly complained.

Objection: Do Apologists forget the work of The Holy Spirit?

Anyone who does apologetics knows the Holy Spirit has to play an integral part of the entire process. As Ergun Caner says, “It is impossible to be effective in apologetics without the work of the Spirit in both the apologist and the hearer.” (2) No mature apologist forgets that the Bible stresses that humans are blinded by sin. Therefore, sin has damaging consequences on the knowing process (Is. 6:9-10; Zech. 7:11-12; Matt. 13:10-13; 2 Cor. 4:4). How people respond to God’s revelation depends on several factors such as his/her personal history (both past and present). People can be hardened towards God; sin certainly dampens an individual’s ability to being receptive to God’s invitation to them. The Holy Spirit works through apologetics just as He works through preaching.

Objection: Shouldn’t we just preach the gospel?

This is true. By all means, “Preach the Gospel!” But guess what? What do you do when you try to open the Bible and use it with someone who doesn’t think the Bible is an authoritative or inspired book? This happens all the time to Christians. And did you know Muslims and other people think their holy book is just as inspired and authoritative as the Bible? The Hindus think their scriptures are inspired. The Buddhists think their holy scriptures are inspired. If you keep trying to quote the Bible, you would be “begging the question.”

“Begging the question” is a form of logical fallacy in which a statement or claim is assumed to be true without evidence other than the statement or claim itself. When one begs the question, the initial assumption of a statement is treated as already proven without any logic to show why the statement is true in the first place. In some cases, you may be able to go quote the Bible to many people without any objections, like when you’re trying to witness to Mormons and Jehova’s Witnesses. If you’re witnessing to Jews, you can show them all the messianic prophesies and how Jesus fulfilled all of the prophesies. But in other cases (like when witnessing to atheists and agnostics), you would need to show the individual the Bible is a reliable historical document before trying to use it as an authoritative text in these types of conversations.

Avoiding Apologetics can have dire consequences.
Christianity is under a severe attack in this day and age. In fact, I’ve never seen the Christian faith under attack more than I have in the 21st century. “The New Atheist” movement has set a goal to eliminate religious belief from the face of the Earth. High School teachers and College professors endorse Darwinian evolution and try to convince your kids that a Creator was not needed for advanced life to come into being.

Christian philosopher William Lane Craig concurs. He said “In high school and college Christian teenagers are intellectually assaulted with every manner of non-Christian worldview coupled with an overwhelming relativism. If parents are not intellectually engaged with their faith and do not have sound arguments for Christian theism and good answers to their children’s questions, then we are in real danger of losing our youth. It’s no longer enough to simply teach our children Bible stories; they need doctrine and apologetics. It’s hard to understand how people today can risk parenthood without having studied apologetics.”

If Jesus wants us to have blind faith, then why did He have to fulfill so many ancient prophesies? 
If God required us to have blind faith, then why did Jesus have to fulfill so many prophesies to PROVE to the Jews that He was the true messiah? Why couldn’t Jesus just come onto the scene and say “Hey, I’m the Messiah, follow me!” Maybe because so many other people were claiming to be the Messiah at the time period and they were NOT the messiah. The Jews needed the ability to tell truth from falsehood. The Jews needed the ability to tell the difference between the TRUE messiah and a phony. Blind Faith can’t give you that. God gave the Jews a test for the real messiah to take and if He was able to get a perfect score, then their conclusion would be that He was and is the messiah. Lee Strobel calls this “The Fingerprint Evidence” in his book “The Case For Christ”. Jesus had to fulfill each and every one of the messianic prophesies. If He did, then that proved He was the genuine article.
Blind Faith can actually be dangerous!
Blind Faith can actually be dangerous. How are you going to “beware of false prophets” like Jesus said if you don’t exercise some discernment? Back in ancient Judaism, the way to tell if a prophet was truly from God was if he gave evidence that he came from God. How’s that? Well, if his prophesies came true then he was truly from The Lord but if his prophesies were false then everyone knew he was a false prophet and they had him stoned. 1 John 4:1 says “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” Yet another verse telling us that blind faith is wrong. This verse is telling us that we should “test the spirits” to see if they give evidence that they are indeed from God.

“I do not feel obliged to believe that same God who endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect had intended for us to forgo their use.” – Galileo Galilei

“As I speak around the country, I often encounter devoted, committed Christians who are hesitant to embrace an evidential faith. In many Christian circles, faith that requires evidential support is seen as weak and inferior. For many, blind faith (a faith that simply trusts without question) is the truest, most sincere, and most valuable form of faith that we can offer God. Yet Jesus seemed to have a high regard for evidence. In John 14:11, He told those watching Him to examine ‘the evidence of miracles’ (NIV) if they did not believe what He said about His identity. Even after the resurrection, Jesus stayed with His disciples for an additional forty days and provided them with ‘many convincing proofs’ that He was resurrected and was who He claimed to be (Acts 1:2-3 NIV). Jesus understood the role and value of evidence and the importance of developing an evidential faith. It’s time for all of us, as Christians, to develop a similarly reasonable faith’.” —J. Warner Wallace

“The “I just take Christianity on (blind) faith” attitude can’t be the right approach. It leaves the Bible without defense, yet Peter directs us to make a defense for the hope that is in us. Also, the biblical word for faith, pistis, doesn’t mean wishing. It means active trust. And trust cannot be conjured up or manufactured. It must be earned. You can’t exercise the kind of faith the Bible has in mind unless you’re reasonably sure that some particular things are true. In fact, I suggest you completely ban the phrase “leap of faith” from your vocabulary. Biblical faith is based on knowledge, not wishing or blind leaps. Knowledge builds confidence and confidence leads to trust. The kind of faith God is interested in is not wishing. It’s trust based on knowing, a sure confidence grounded in evidence.’ – Greg Koukl

Any and every other belief you hold, about anything whatsoever, if it is to be taken seriously, if it is to be of any value or worth anyone’s consideration, it must have in its favor more than your emotions, personal history or external circumstantial factors. It must have reasons.” —Clint Roberts (from the article, Believing for No Reason)
 “Question with boldness. Question even if the very existence of God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.” – Thomas Jefferson

Original Blog Source:

Free Resource

Get the first chapter of "Stealing From God: Why Atheists Need God to Make Their Case" in PDF.

Powered by ConvertKit
9 replies
  1. John B. Moore says:

    Certainly you have some evidence for believing in God, and I suppose you do not have a mathematical, deductive proof that God exists. What I want to know is whether faith is anything else besides inductive reasoning.

    If I roll a die eight times and get a 6 every time, then I believe the ninth roll will also give me a 6. That’s inductive reasoning. I see a pattern of evidence, and I suppose the pattern will continue in a predictable way. Is that why you believe in God?

    You might actually realize that the ninth roll could be some other number besides a 6. Even though the die is weighted, it might still roll differently now and then. So you have that lurking worry in the back of your mind.

    But suddenly you hear an authoritative voice telling you the next roll will most definitely be a 6! It might be an invisible angel speaking to you, or it might be your pastor in the pulpit, or it might be your mother and father, or it might be written in a holy text. So you agree to bet your life on the ninth roll coming up a 6.

    See, if faith is just inductive reasoning, religious people wouldn’t be so passionate and committed. They’d just be hedging their bets and playing the odds. I think faith also requires the authoritative voice, and you must submit to that authority, or else you miss out on the power of faith.

    Or is there something I’m missing? There’s inductive reasoning, and there’s the authoritative voice. Anything else?

    • Craig says:


      ….and I suppose you do not have a mathematical, deductive proof that God exists.

      I have just as much mathematical deductive proof that specifically the God of the Bible exists as much as the mathematical deductive proof that the battle of Waterloo took place, or that a husband and wife love each other or that the backyard view of my vacation house in Bora Bora (just kidding) is beautiful.

      I’m surprised the author didnt quote from Hebrews 11. “Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen” He alluded to it, but the point is, like Koukl points out, the Biblical faith is not blind or wishy washy or a stronger set of meental gymnastics

      In answer to your question ” Or is there something I’m missing? There’s inductive reasoning, and there’s the authoritative voice. Anything else?”

      Yes. there is. its called deductive reasoning. Both inductive and deductive reasoning construct sentences, also known as premises to a conclusion. … Therefore, inductive reasoning moves from specific instances into a generalized conclusion, while deductive reasoning moves from generalized principles that are known to be true to a true and specific conclusion.

      Brginnings of the foundation for deductive evidence and proof of the existence of the Biblical God are found in Romans 1 and 2 re: creation and conscience. No other religious system has as part of its doctrine (or even an accidental footnote or sidebar) an explanation or need for discussion the origin of such things. The Bible exclusively tells us the who what where when why and how fo these things.

      I’ll ask the question that Frank is fond of asking “If Biblical Chritianity were evidentially and objectively true, would you vecome a Christian?”


      • Ed Vaessen says:

        “Brginnings of the foundation for deductive evidence and proof of the existence of the Biblical God are found in Romans 1 and 2 re: creation and conscience. No other religious system has as part of its doctrine (or even an accidental footnote or sidebar) an explanation or need for discussion the origin of such things. The Bible exclusively tells us the who what where when why and how fo these things. “

        Proof of the existence of God being a disciple of Steven Spielberg is found in the gospel of Matthew, with earthquakes, solar eclipses and walking zombies.

        • Chris D says:

          Ah ha ha ha ha, you’re adorable. But yeah, there are zombies and even aliens as well as continent sized space ships in Revelations! I hope Passion of the Christ 2 covers that part.

  2. Sanford says:

    Just a few thoughts: Hebrews 11:1 states, “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen”. My faith (not to mention the faith of the millions of believers who have gone before, are alive now, and are yet to be born and born again) IS evidence of His existence. But I still say that apologists spend way too much time and energy trying to “prove” God. A worldly concept is “seeing is believing”. But in things pertaining to the Spirit, just the opposite is true: believing is seeing! There are those of us who have had awesome, undeniable personal experiences with God, knowing without doubt that we have “seen” Him, and been in His presence. But what of those who have never had the experience? We encourage them to “just believe”, as Jesus taught. He said to Thomas in John 20:16, “because you have seen me, you have believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed”. Lastly, we must come to grips with the fact that the Bible is clear that there will be those who will never believe, even if they have seen. John 12:37 teaches that though Jesus “had done so many miracles before them, yet they believed not on Him”. The text then states this was the fulfillment of an old testament (Isaiah 6:10) prophecy which said, “He has blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them”.

    • toby says:

      believing is seeing!
      Do you not see what you’re doing, though? I have a saying when it comes to this, “You have to believe before you believe so that you can believe.” All you’re doing is setting yourself up for confirmation bias. “I’m going to believe this so when x,y,z happens I can say, ‘Wow! God!'” If you believe that ghosts exist and you go into a house that people have told you was haunted, guess what’s going to happen. “I felt something in there! I saw something.”

      This seems to be pure gullibility.

  3. Deante Kendrick says:

    It’s crazy to me how people put the basis of their hope and faith in the creator in a book. That’s ludicrous based on the amount of information in books that isn’t true. Also using examples of times, places, and cultures we know anything about. The letter J not existing at the time Jesus was born, him being one of 13 other messiah’s from different traditions bring born of a virgin, the fact that King James was a satanist….It seems like there would be better explanations. Just like Christians ought to use better examples. It’s archaic how this article gives validity to the man upstairs idea as if good is above us playing puppet Master and calling shots. My reasons for faith in a creator is substantially based on fact like everything you see is alive, we have a living planet moving through space on free energy, or when I’m devoid of thoughts I am able to tap into the powerful energy of the creator. Faith is observing the sensational creation and knowing that the same power to create is in you. When I hear Christians talk in a way similiar to this article, I can see that most of them are getting their information from the dead letter. In order to interpret the Bible and getting understanding and inner standing from it, you must use meditation. A book may not hold accurate, if so bias, propaganda, myths, opinion, and cultural influence. King James was a gay satanist himself and he translated the so called word of God. If you want to “bring people to Jesus”, don’t be foolish enough to tell an avid thinker outside the box individual like myself this stupid business of faith. Instead, reason with their humanity by explaining why you have faith, and that it’s something that you gain the more you understand how the creator works through his creation. Use personal experience and explain that a book only has knowledge but we know the creator through studying the living creation of the mind who created it. Duh anything else and you make yourself sound like a bible believing fanatic instead of a rational thinking individual endowed with the wisdom of the creator.

    • Chris D says:

      Hmm. Open my mind to the microcosm and believe whatever nonsense happens to perpetuate in my brain? No thank you. There is evidence that God exists outside the bible, but the fact that the earth turns due to spacetime and gravity is not among them. I have seen a demon. I have been miraculously cured over night of a debilitating disease by an old woman via her phenomenal faith! I have prayed to keep from getting raped by someone who had a sexually transmitted disease and the unthinkable happened to save me. I have prayed and had god answer it by saying no, yet I believed and trusted God would have my back and best interests at heart and make sure things worked out for my better, which he did. You are only going a step beyond many other religions by believing in some unknowable creative force behind the wondrous creation, but you need to progress yet a couple steps further. As far as King James being a gay satanist, don’t believe everything you read online. It’s just a rumor by haters trying to detract, like people saying Catholics believe suicide sends you to hell when in their Catechisms it is clear as day they should believe no such thing!


Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *