Por qué el cristiano NO debe rechazar la filosofía (parte I)

By Xavier Gonzalez

I have often encountered Christians who say “Philosophy is bad”, “we only need the scriptures and no philosophy”, “philosophy is from the devil” and statements like that, but I consider that these ideas that they try to sustain, in the end, are false. The notion that the Christian must reject philosophy is somewhat absurd and catastrophic. And in this article I will mention why and the need for philosophy in Christianity.

To the surprise of some (from what I have been able to study) throughout the history of the Church they have been able to know how to use tweezers (and others not) to approve and reject or modify the theses of various philosophers, even this we can see in certain passages of the Bible where Paul cites certain pagans as in Acts 17:28, where the part that says: “For in Him we live, and move, and have our being [or exist] … For we are his offspring” are quotes attributed to both Aratus (310 BC) and Epimenides of Cretans (600 BC), which already starting from here, we can see that Paul was not against philosophy at all, but wait, what happens with Colossians 2:8? Did Paul change his mind? Was it hypocritical Paul to quote philosophers in his speech in Athens when in Colossae he says not to be carried away by those who use philosophical arguments? Did Paul contradict himself? And my answer is no, Paul neither contradicted himself, nor was he a hypocrite, and much less did he change his mind.

Before moving on to the points of why a Christian should not reject philosophy, it will be appropriate to give the context of Colossians 2:8. According to the verse it tells us the following:

“Be on your guard so that no one takes you captive through empty and deceptive philosophy that follows human tradition, according to the principles of this world rather than according to Christ.” (NIV)

According to commentator AT Robertson, what Paul uses as Philosophos is not a condemnation of philosophy as such, but rather a false philosophy “Science falsely called” (pseudönumos gnösis, 1 Tim. 6:20) which is descriptive of Gnostic philosophy where many of its arguments are misleading and empty. [1] Even the Jamieson-Fausset-Brown commentary says: The apostle Paul does not condemn all philosophy, but the philosophy (so the Greek) of the Judeo-Oriental heretics at Colossae, which later developed into Gnosticism. [2] and according to the Ryrie Study Bible it mentions that Paul uses the vocabulary of the heretics, thus giving their true meaning, and then refutes them with their own terms that they used. Also the Partain-Reeves commentary mentions that according to Josephus, in those times any system of thought or moral discipline was called a philosophy. And in Judaism there were three philosophical schools, which were Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes.

And if this is not enough, Moyer Hubbard’s team.org writes:

“Looking now at Colossians and the specific context of chapter 2, we find Paul addressing a local assembly that had been infiltrated by a form of false teaching that threatened to undermine the gospel he preached. Paul does not give us enough information to identify precisely what sect or ‘philosophy’ he is describing. However, there are some clues that suggest it was perhaps a syncretistic hybrid of Jewish mystical practices and pagan folk belief: he mentions the observance of special days, including the Sabbath (v. 16); visionary experience and worship of angels (v. 18); submission to the ‘elemental spirits of the world’ (v. 20); and abstinence (vv. 21,23). Paul is clearly attacking a peculiar form of religious speculation, but it is impossible to identify it with any of the major schools of philosophy we know from the Greco-Roman world. In fact, it is important to note that the Greek word philosophia (and its Latin cognate) had a variety of meanings in this period and, depending on the context, could be translated as ‘religion’, ‘speculation’ or ‘inquiry’” [3] .

In that case, using Colossians 2:8 to condemn philosophy would not be appropriate because it would be misinterpreting the verse. So we can safely say that Paul was not in any strict sense condemning philosophy as such, but rather a philosophy that (1) followed the principles of this world and (2) was not in conformity with Christ . Now that these doubts have been cleared up, let us address both the why and the need for philosophy in Christianity. [ In the next part of this article ].

References:

[1] Commentary on the Greek text of the NT, AT Robertson

[2] Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary

[3] https://www.equip.org/article/is-colossians-28-a-warning-against-philosophy/

Recommended resources in Spanish:

Stealing from God ( Paperback ), ( Teacher Study Guide ), and ( Student Study Guide ) by Dr. Frank Turek

Why I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist ( Complete DVD Series ), ( Teacher’s Workbook ), and ( Student’s Handbook ) by Dr. Frank Turek

Xavier Gonzalez is from Venezuela and is dedicated to the study of philosophy, early Christianity and theology. He converted to Christianity at the age of 15. He managed the Me Lo Contó Un Ateo website and is in charge of the apologetics section of the Iglesia Cristiana la gracia website ( http://www.iglesialagracia.org ).