We have now reached the fourth part of my series on Wikipedia and the evidence for common descent. In previous entries, I discussed Wikipedia’s arguments for common descent based on comparative physiology / biochemistry, comparative anatomy, and paleontology. Now I am going to address the arguments from biogeographical distribution. Biogeography is essentially the study of the geographical and historical distribution of species in relation to one another. The argument holds that species are related in accordance with their geographical proximity to one another.
About us
CrossExamined.org is a non-profit ministry started in 2006 that conducts dynamic I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be An Atheist seminars on college campuses, churches, and high schools.
subscribe to blog
Total Subscribers: 102,522
Our App
Recent Posts
- Evidence for the Book of EstherBy Tony WilliamsApril 24, 2024
- Atheists’ Faith in Science is MisplacedBy Al SerratoApril 22, 2024
- The Suffering ChristianBy Thomas H. MollerApril 17, 2024
Popular Posts
- The Mind-Blowing Meaning Behind the Sign of Jonah by Guest | posted on October 13, 2021
- The Top 20 Christian Apologists by Frank Turek | posted on May 31, 2014
- A Simple Reason Why The Qur’an Cannot Be The Word of God by Jonathan McLatchie | posted on April 2, 2014
- What Does it Mean to be Unequally Yoked? by Guest | posted on March 15, 2023
- Atheists’ Faith in Science is Misplaced by Ty Unknown | posted on April 22, 2024
Facebook Comments