We have recently been discussing a series of critical reviews of Science and Human Origins published by PhD student Paul McBride on his blog Still Monkeys. I am going to respond now to McBride’s review of chapter 4, in which he tackles Casey Luskin’s handling of the subject of “junk DNA.” McBride’s rebuttal to chapter 4 is divided into two sections — part 1 and part 2. First, McBride (before having read the chapter) makes ten predictions about what he will find. He then offers a response to the chapter itself.
About us
CrossExamined.org is a non-profit ministry started in 2006 that conducts dynamic I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be An Atheist seminars on college campuses, churches, and high schools.
subscribe to blog
Total Subscribers: 102,522
Our App
Recent Posts
- Dismantling DoubtBy Deanna HuffMarch 27, 2024
- Here Comes the He Gets Us Campaign Again: Why Its Portrayal of Jesus is Still a ProblemBy Natasha CrainMarch 25, 2024
- The Need for Cognitive Closure in Dealing with DoubtsBy Jonathan McLatchieMarch 20, 2024
Popular Posts
- The Mind-Blowing Meaning Behind the Sign of Jonah by Guest | posted on October 13, 2021
- Resurrection Defense Series: Reasons to Accept the Empty Tomb by Guest | posted on May 26, 2021
- Why was the Head Cloth of Jesus Wrapped to the Side? by Guest | posted on April 14, 2019
- A Simple Reason Why The Qur’an Cannot Be The Word of God by Jonathan McLatchie | posted on April 2, 2014
- The Top 20 Christian Apologists by Frank Turek | posted on May 31, 2014
Facebook Comments